Treatise on Geophysics 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53802-4.00121-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mountain Building, Tectonic Evolution, Rheology, and Crustal Flow in the Himalaya, Karakoram, and Tibet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 225 publications
(333 reference statements)
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Himalayan orogeny (Figure ) initiated during the final closure of Neotethys at ~50 Ma and has maintained convergence since that time [ Green et al ., ; Najman et al ., ; Searle et al ., ; Avouac , ; Searle , ]. In the Annapurna‐Dhaulagiri Himalaya (Figure ), the GHS is bound below and above by the Main Central Thrust (MCT; top‐SW) and South Tibetan Detachment (STD; top‐down‐ENE) and may be subdivided into the Main Central Thrust Zone (MCTZ), Upper Greater Himalayan Sequence (UGHS), and South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS) [ Larson and Godin , ; Carosi et al ., ; Parsons et al ., , , ].…”
Section: The Annapurna‐dhaulagiri Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Himalayan orogeny (Figure ) initiated during the final closure of Neotethys at ~50 Ma and has maintained convergence since that time [ Green et al ., ; Najman et al ., ; Searle et al ., ; Avouac , ; Searle , ]. In the Annapurna‐Dhaulagiri Himalaya (Figure ), the GHS is bound below and above by the Main Central Thrust (MCT; top‐SW) and South Tibetan Detachment (STD; top‐down‐ENE) and may be subdivided into the Main Central Thrust Zone (MCTZ), Upper Greater Himalayan Sequence (UGHS), and South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS) [ Larson and Godin , ; Carosi et al ., ; Parsons et al ., , , ].…”
Section: The Annapurna‐dhaulagiri Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Karakoram metamorphic sequence has undergone great amounts of crustal thickening (70-90 km), leading to partial melting, and its exhumation would have been led by transpression followed by debated amounts of strike-slip motion (eg. Searle, 2015). The spatial association between high-grade metamorphic rocks and crustal-scale shear zones is still debated, although it is noted along many orogenic belts spanning from the Proterozoic to present day (eg.…”
Section: Comparison With Syn-compressional Exhumation In Other Orogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However distinct exhumation patterns are reported in different domains throughout both orogenies, reflecting a variety of tectonic processes (eg. Gapais et al, 2009 ;Lardeaux et al, 2014 ;Searle, 2015). Throughout the India-Asia collision zone, accommodation of present day shortening remains debated from the upper crust down into the upper mantle (eg.…”
Section: Comparison With Syn-compressional Exhumation In Other Orogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The timing of continental collision between India and Asia is important for many reasons and thus has been the subject of intense studies. The magmatic, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks of the Himalayan and Gangdese Mountains record details of important tectonic processes operating during the closure of the Neo-Tethys Ocean and the subsequent India-Asia continental collision (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5]). In particular, northward subduction of the Neo-Tethys oceanic slab beneath the southern margin of the Asian continent is evident from the occurrence of not only obducted ophiolite complexes on the northern margin of the India continent but also magmatic arc systems (e.g., the Kohistan, Ladakh and Gangdese arcs) close to the southern margin of the Asian continent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%