Mouse development with a single E2F activator

Abstract

The E2F family is conserved from C. elegans to mammals with some family members having transcription activation functions and others having repressor functions 1, 2 . Whereas C. elegans 3 and Drosophila melanogaster 4, 5 have a single E2F activator and repressor proteins, mammals evolved to have at least three activator and five repressor proteins 1,2,6 . Why such genetic complexity evolved in mammals is not known. To begin to evaluate this genetic complexity, we targeted the inactivation of the entire subset of activators, E2f1, E2f2, E2f3a and E2f3b, singly or in combination in mice. We demonstrate that E2f3a is sufficient to support mouse embryonic and postnatal development. Remarkably, expression of E2f3b or E2f1 from the E2f3a locus (E2f3a 3bki ; E2f3a 1ki ) suppressed all the postnatal phenotypes associated with the inactivation of E2f3a. We conclude that there is significant functional redundancy among activators and that the specific requirement for E2f3a during postnatal development is dictated by regulatory sequences governing its selective spatiotemporal expression and not by its intrinsic protein functions. These findings provide a molecular basis for the observed specificity among E2F activators during development. KeywordsE2F3a; E2F3b; Rb; development; proliferation; transcription and apoptosis Since the identification of the founding E2F family member, E2f1 7 , two distinct genes in lower eukaryotes and eight genes in higher eukaryotes have been identified to encode the signature DNA binding domain that endow these transcription factors with E2F 1,2,6 . Among the mammalian E2F activator subset, the E2f3 gene has emerged as the critical family member involved in the control of cell proliferation and development 8,9 . The E2f3 locus was originally thought to encode a single DNA binding activity, but was later shown to drive the expression of two related isoforms, E2f3a and E2f3b, from two distinct promoters 10 . Given the critical link between the E2f3 locus and the control of cell proliferation, we used homologous recombination to individually disrupt its two isoforms in mice and rigorously evaluate how their functions are integrated with that of other E2F activators. The inactivation of E2f3a or E2f3b was achieved by targeting exon 1a or 1b sequences, respectively, using LoxP-cre technology (Fig. 1a). Mice deleted for either exon 1a or exon 1b were identified by Southern blot and genomic PCR analysis (Fig. 1b). Specific ablation of E2f3a or E2f3b was confirmed by Western blot assays using total E2F3-specific antibodies (Fig. 1c).It was previously shown that inactivation of both E2f3a and E2f3b (E2f3 −/− ) in mice with a mixed strain background yielded offspring that developed rather normally 8, 9 , but we show here that breeding these mice into a pure strain background (∼98% pure) resulted in embryonic lethality ( Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1). Intercrossing E2f3 +/− mice of different pure backgrounds restored viability of E2f3 −/− mice, albeit with some observed strain-specific biase...

Functional high-throughput screening identifies the miR-15 microRNA family as cellular restriction factors for Salmonella infection

“…3j). E2F3 has been shown to be sufficient for cell proliferation and normal embryonic and post-natal development [38][39][40] , thus explaining the observed cell cycle progression despite the downregulation of E2F1 by Salmonella.…”

Oncogenic ETS fusions deregulate E2F3 target genes in Ewing sarcoma and prostate cancer

“…The fact that knockdown of E2F3 does not affect promoter activity to the same extent as EWSR1/FLI1 silencing (Fig. 4A) may be explained by functional redundancy among co-expressed E2F family members (Tsai et al 2008).…”

Tissue-specific targeting of cell fate regulatory genes by E2f factors

“…Germline E2f3a-and E2f3b-deficient mice were generated originally by GL and were maintained on an FVB/N background. 8,54 All cells used in this study were cultured as neurospheres. Neural precursors were obtained by dissection of the ganglionic eminence from developing embryos at gestational age E14.5, and cells were cultured as neurospheres as previously described.…”