Uganda 2018
DOI: 10.5040/9781350223721.ch-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement legacy’ and neoliberalism as political settlement in Uganda’s political economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, factors such as violence, playing a key role in ensuring political support and electoral success to Museveni's regime (Anderson & Fisher, 2016), and religion, maintaining the capacity to mobilise people and influence public debates (Alava & Ssentongo, 2016; Bompani & Valois, 2017) also cause inevitable repercussions on the country's social contract and government legitimacy. State‐citizen relations , moreover, are heavily affected by patterns of patronage, frequent under the colonial rule, and still widely used as a ‘neopatrimonial’ political bargaining tool (Médard & Golaz, 2013; Rubongoya, 2018; Titeca, 2018) not only during elections, but also in day‐to‐day interactions. This heavily politicised environment can be further explained, for example, by the existence and importance of Local Councils (LC 3 ), introduced in 1993 and granted with political, administrative and fiscal powers.…”
Section: Study Context and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, factors such as violence, playing a key role in ensuring political support and electoral success to Museveni's regime (Anderson & Fisher, 2016), and religion, maintaining the capacity to mobilise people and influence public debates (Alava & Ssentongo, 2016; Bompani & Valois, 2017) also cause inevitable repercussions on the country's social contract and government legitimacy. State‐citizen relations , moreover, are heavily affected by patterns of patronage, frequent under the colonial rule, and still widely used as a ‘neopatrimonial’ political bargaining tool (Médard & Golaz, 2013; Rubongoya, 2018; Titeca, 2018) not only during elections, but also in day‐to‐day interactions. This heavily politicised environment can be further explained, for example, by the existence and importance of Local Councils (LC 3 ), introduced in 1993 and granted with political, administrative and fiscal powers.…”
Section: Study Context and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%