2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00415.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement of the grape berry moth,Endopiza viteana: displacement distance and direction

Abstract: Mark-release-recapture is used to quantify displacement by adults of the North American grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana Clemens (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) under field conditions. Moths marked with fluorescent dust are released eight times in the centre of a vineyard over 2 years, and recaptured using pheromone traps and interception traps. In vineyards, male moths are recaptured an average of 13.8 AE 0.8 m from the release site (maximum 58.2 m), whereas female displacement is similar with average flight dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the structural connectivity also positively influenced the detritivore/tourist populations. In general, field margins have greater arthropod abundance and diversity than the agricultural fields (Botero‐Garcés & Isaacs, ; Denys & Tscharntke, ) and can provide potential refuge and food resources for flower‐visiting, non‐pest insects and predatory arthropods (Lagerlöf & Wallin, ). The suitability of these field margins as habitat for natural enemies can also depend on the width of the margin and the way margin vegetation is managed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our case, the structural connectivity also positively influenced the detritivore/tourist populations. In general, field margins have greater arthropod abundance and diversity than the agricultural fields (Botero‐Garcés & Isaacs, ; Denys & Tscharntke, ) and can provide potential refuge and food resources for flower‐visiting, non‐pest insects and predatory arthropods (Lagerlöf & Wallin, ). The suitability of these field margins as habitat for natural enemies can also depend on the width of the margin and the way margin vegetation is managed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the structural connectivity also positively influenced the detritivore/tourist populations. In general, field margins have greater arthropod abundance and diversity than the agricultural fields (Botero-Garcés & Isaacs, 2004;Denys & Tscharntke, 2002) and…”
Section: Landscape Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insects are continuously stimulated to fly, due to permanent stimulation resulting from a lack of tarsal contact (Edwards ) and flight performances recorded on flight mills are often an entire order of magnitude greater than those obtained in flight chambers (Shirai and Kosugi ; Yamanaka et al. ) or in mark–release–recapture experiments (Botero‐Garces and Isaacs ). However, these alternative methods generally provide underestimates of flight capacity, due to spatial constraints (size of the chamber, distance of traps from the release point, for example Franzen and Nilsson ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify flying ability, adult females were individually introduced into a flight mill adapted from the device of Schumacher et al (Schumacher et al, 1997;Bruzzone et al, 2009). Data recorded from such experimental devices are known to overestimate the total distance and total time an insect does usually travel by flight (Bruzzone et al, 2009) as compared with mark-release-recapture data (Botero-Garces & Isaacs, 2004). It nevertheless corroborates trends found in the field and is efficient at detecting the differences possibly existing between several species (Chen et al, 2006) or between individuals of the same species (e.g.…”
Section: Experimental Design For Quantifying Flying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%