Movimentos sociais no governo Bolsonaro

Medeiros, Leonilde Servolo de

doi:10.5418/ra2020.v16i29.12502

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The deinstitutionalization and the displacement of CONDRAF's policy community started in the beginning of the Temer government, which, in 2016, dissolved MDA and shattered PAA. Under Bolsonaro, rural development policies were dismantled (Medeiros, 2020). When CONDRAF was dissolved, existing repertoires for interacting with the Executive Branch and the Council, whose institutional design was weak, were no longer as important for civil society, which could rely on vast networks and arrays of repertoire, such as marches, food distribution campaigns, supporters from the left and from state-level Legislative and Executive Branches (Medeiros, 2020).…”

Section: Inert Formal: National Council For Women's Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration

Bezerra,

Almeida,

Lavalle

et al. 2024

Dados

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims at characterizing the deinstitutionalization prompted by the Bolsonaro government and assessing its impact over participatory councils. It provides an empirical diagnosis of the regulatory situation of 103 national collegial bodies, based on an original database. It argues that the government measures do not result in homogeneous effects and can vary according to two factors: i) the government´s preferences in policy content; ii) the councils’ resilience. It proposes an analytical typology of resilience based on the interaction between two dimensions: institutional design and councils’ degree of insertion in their respective policy communities. Considering both dimensions, it concludes that councils whose performance was the most affected were the ones related to policies whose agenda is contrary to that of the Bolsonaro’s government, and displaying less resilience. In proportion, the environment policy area was the most affected by revocations. Human rights and social policies underwent more substantive changes. In turn, the economic development and infrastructure area was less affected, due to its greater alignment to the government’s preferences, even though its collegial bodies were less resilient.

show abstract

Section: Inert Formal: National Council For Women's Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration

Bezerra,

Almeida,

Lavalle

et al. 2024

Dados

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Building Food Markets as a Method for Confronting the Rise of Authoritarian Populism: How the New Political Regime Has Forced Rural Movements to Create New Action Repertoires in Southern Brazil

Pizarro Muñoz,

de Castro,

Niederle

2024

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines how the political construction of food markets acts as a strategy for collective action with regards to three rural movements in Brazil: CONTAG, the MST, and Rede Ecovida. Each used food markets to confront the effects of a regime change that occurred with the rise of a populist authoritarian government. The research for this article was conducted between October 2017 and December 2020 through documentary analysis, observation, and interviews with social leaders. The results show how, since Jair Bolsonaro’s election as president, building new markets became vital to movements that sought to resist the influence of authoritarian populism as well as those that sought to dismantle public policies. A comparative analysis between the three movements also demonstrates how their diverse forms of organization and different political projects led to variations in how markets became privileged within larger political campaigns. O artigo discute a construção política de mercados alimentares como estratégia de ação coletiva de três movimentos rurais brasileiros (CONTAG, MST e Rede Ecovida) em face da mudança de regime ocasionada pela ascensão de um governo populista autoritário. A pesquisa foi realizada entre outubro de 2017 e dezembro de 2020, por meio de análise documental, observação e entrevistas com lideranças sociais. Os resultados apontam que, a partir da chegada de Jair Bolsonaro à presidência, a construção de novos mercados tornou-se um componente essencial de resistência ao populismo autoritário e ao consequente desmantelamento das políticas públicas. A análise comparativa entre os três movimentos também demonstra que seus distintos formatos organizacionais e projetos políticos repercutem em diferenças com relação aos mercados privilegiados pela ação política.

show abstract

SISTEMAS ALIMENTARES EM DISPUTA: respostas dos movimentos sociais à pandemia Covid-19

Carvalho

Teixeira

Motta

et al. 2022

Rev. bras. Ci. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar como ativismos rurais no Brasil reagiram à pandemia da Covid-19. Para tanto, mapeamos as ações das principais organizações que congregam agricultores familiares e camponeses no país, nos primeiros sete meses da pandemia, de março a setembro de 2020: Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores Rurais Agricultores e Agricultoras Familiares (Contag), Confederação Nacional dos Trabalhadores e Trabalhadoras na Agricultura Familiar do Brasil (Contraf-Brasil), Movimento dos Pequenos Agricultores (MPA) e Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST). As fontes de dados são notícias publicadas nos sites de cada organização. Para entender como a pandemia impactou algumas de suas práticas pré-existentes, propomos uma tipologia composta por cinco formas de ação: doação, interpelação institucional, criação de mercados alternativos, ação direta, e ação informacional.

show abstract

Movimentos sociais no governo Bolsonaro

Cited by 5 publications

References 16 publications

Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration

Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration

Building Food Markets as a Method for Confronting the Rise of Authoritarian Populism: How the New Political Regime Has Forced Rural Movements to Create New Action Repertoires in Southern Brazil

SISTEMAS ALIMENTARES EM DISPUTA: respostas dos movimentos sociais à pandemia Covid-19

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About