2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond standard procedures to assess spontaneous recognition memory

Abstract: This review will consider how spontaneous tasks have been applied alongside neuroscientific techniques to test complex forms of recognition memory for objects and their environmental features, e.g. the spatial location of an object or the context in which it is presented. We discuss studies that investigate the roles of the perirhinal cortex and the hippocampus in recognition memory using standard testing paradigms, and consider how these findings contribute to the ongoing debate about whether recognition memo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as we previously reported, calpain-1 activation is required for TBS-induced LTP formation and for certain forms of learning, including context-dependent fear conditioning and novel object location and recognition, which are known to be hippocampus-dependent (Vogel-Ciernia and Wood 2014; Ameen-Ali et al 2015;Izquierdo et al 2016). On the other hand, calpain-1 activation does not appear to be required for tone-dependent fear conditioning, which is generally considered to be amygdala-dependent (Maren et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, as we previously reported, calpain-1 activation is required for TBS-induced LTP formation and for certain forms of learning, including context-dependent fear conditioning and novel object location and recognition, which are known to be hippocampus-dependent (Vogel-Ciernia and Wood 2014; Ameen-Ali et al 2015;Izquierdo et al 2016). On the other hand, calpain-1 activation does not appear to be required for tone-dependent fear conditioning, which is generally considered to be amygdala-dependent (Maren et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…With the growing use of the several close variants of the spontaneous recognition memory task in rodents (Ameen-Ali et al, 2015), our results may have important prospective implications for the development of a preclinical cross-species procedure to assess specific memory functions. However, more comprehensive studies in marmosets are warranted, given that in rodents, for example, not all types of spontaneous recognition memories are affected by central cholinergic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In handling the animal there is likely to be some stress invoked (even very small amounts) and whilst memory is expected through exploration of novelty, there is evidence that stress produces a preference for familiar objects (neophobia) in animals (Ennaceur, 2010), meaning there is significant behavioural noise added as a result of the handling procedures. In recent years we have adopted a new approach to spontaneous recognition memory tasks (Ameen-Ali, Ameen-Ali, Easton, & Eacott, 2015;Robertson et al, 2015) which overcome some of these practical limitations. In the new procedure, testing on the spontaneous recognition task occurs within an arena with a start/holding box attached to it to which the animal can return themselves at the end of a stage through a return door.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%