2019
DOI: 10.1108/jchmsd-12-2016-0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving beyond the hard boundary

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to assess the consequences of a nature-culture divide in spatial policy on cultural heritage in the Dutch Wadden Sea area, which is protected by UNESCO for its ecological assets. Design/methodology/approach-This paper investigates this by discussing the international and national policy frameworks and regional examples of the consequences of the divide. Findings-The effects of the nature-culture divide appear to be negative for the landscape. Approaching the Wadden Sea Regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Anthropocene is a central concept in this context (Olsen & Pétursdóttir 2014), used to analyse and understand human life in relation to changes on the planet and to critique the separation of nature and culture in environmental and landscape policy). Scholars have argued that this dichotomy works counterproductive for the integration of heritage in spatial planning and policy of coastal regions nearby the study area of this paper (Krauβ 2005; Egberts & Schroor 2018; Egberts 2019).…”
Section: The Heritage and Climate Nexus In Academic Discoursementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Anthropocene is a central concept in this context (Olsen & Pétursdóttir 2014), used to analyse and understand human life in relation to changes on the planet and to critique the separation of nature and culture in environmental and landscape policy). Scholars have argued that this dichotomy works counterproductive for the integration of heritage in spatial planning and policy of coastal regions nearby the study area of this paper (Krauβ 2005; Egberts & Schroor 2018; Egberts 2019).…”
Section: The Heritage and Climate Nexus In Academic Discoursementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This means that the area outside the dike is protected by national policy and is internationally recognized for its natural heritage values. The dike itself forms a sharp division between a "natural landscape" and a "cultural landscape" that needs protection against nature's potentially threatening tides (Egberts 2019).…”
Section: Case Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to many unwanted side effects for both, as important values remain out of sight in decision-making processes and protection schemes. Some argue that the making the holistic concept landscape central to heritage management could contribute to overcoming divides, as it can include natural and cultural values, as well as a strong political and social dimension (Krauss 2015;Egberts 2018).…”
Section: Cultural Heritage and Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional identity narratives are often shaped in similar ways, although levels of institutionalization vary from one region to another (Paasi 1986). The process of selection from the past often follows a distinct pattern, in which it is decided what parts of the past are useful for regional and national identity construction and which should be left out (Egberts 2017).…”
Section: Conclusion: Marginalized Pasts In Heritage Preservation?mentioning
confidence: 99%