2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2012.6425976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving horizon estimation for staged QP problems

Abstract: Abstract-This paper considers moving horizon estimation (MHE) approach to solution of staged quadratic programming (QP) problems. Using an insight into the constrained solution structure for the growing horizon, we develop a very accurate iterative update of the arrival cost in the MHE solution. The update uses a quadratic approximation of the arrival cost and information about the previously active or inactive constraints. In the absence of constraints, the update is the familiar Kalman filter in information … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For (6), we have x e k ∈ X , w k ∈ W, where X = X ×E , W = W × V. The variables (x e k , w k , y k , ν k ) in (6) represent the parameters of the real augmented process, and we denote (χ e k , ω k , η k , υ k ) and ( x e k , w k , y k , ν k ) as the corresponding decision variables and the optimal solutions in the optimization, respectively. For notational ease, we still use y k and ν k to denote the optimal output prediction and fitting error for (6) as for (1). For system (6), consider the constrained estimation problem…”
Section: A Embellishing a Pre-estimator Into Mhementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For (6), we have x e k ∈ X , w k ∈ W, where X = X ×E , W = W × V. The variables (x e k , w k , y k , ν k ) in (6) represent the parameters of the real augmented process, and we denote (χ e k , ω k , η k , υ k ) and ( x e k , w k , y k , ν k ) as the corresponding decision variables and the optimal solutions in the optimization, respectively. For notational ease, we still use y k and ν k to denote the optimal output prediction and fitting error for (6) as for (1). For system (6), consider the constrained estimation problem…”
Section: A Embellishing a Pre-estimator Into Mhementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from [3], the heading of the vehicle is assumed to be unknown. Assume the input is zero and the sampling period T = 0.5 s. We design a pre-estimator with Firstly, for system (6), we compare the metamorphic MHE in Section II (with λ taking the value of 0.1, 0.5) with the the unbiased FIR filter in [13]. As such, we choose Q = I 4 ; R = 0.5I 3 ; M = 10I 7 , and the rolling horizon length to be 20 in both metamorphic MHE and FIR.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such constraints include physical model limitations, e.g. lower and upper bounds on the state variables, or artificially added constraints that aim to capture some insights regarding the dynamics such as state transition smoothness or sparse state changes [15]. In this work we exploit the MHE approach to incorporate additional constraints that provide sensor-fault tolerance.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15], [16]). However, under a linear model with Gaussian noise and no constraints the AC is derived in closed form as:…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development will be in terms of general causal descriptor systems, which includes the standard state space representation as a special case. The potential of the new estimation algorithm will be demonstrated with an example showing a significant reduction in both computation time and numerical errors compared to conventional MHE.Recently in [11] an approximation hypothesis was used to derive a simple arrival cost update for general staged QP problems with sufficiently large horizon lengths by assuming that the active and inactive state constraints of the last state in the moving horizon window remain respectively active or…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%