Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers’ Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles

Abstract

Objective This paper investigates driver engagement with vehicle automation and the transition to manual control in the context of a phenomenon that we have termed vicarious steering—drivers steering when the vehicle is under automated control. Background Automated vehicles introduce many challenges, including disengagement from the driving task and out-of-the-loop performance decrement. We examine drivers’ steering behavior when the automation is engaged, and steering input has no effect on the vehicle state. Such vicarious steering is a potential indicator of engagement for evaluating automated vehicles. Method A total of 32 female and 32 male drivers between 25 and 55 years of age participated in this experiment. A 2 × 2 between-subject design combined control algorithms and instructed responsibility. The control algorithms (lane centering and adaptive) were intended to convey the capability of the automation. The adaptive algorithm drifted across the lane center when latent hazards were present. The instructed levels of responsibility (driver primarily responsible and automation primarily responsible) were intended to replicate the admonitions of owners’ manuals. Results The adaptive algorithm increased vicarious steering ( p < .001), but instructed responsibility did not ( p = .67), and there was no interaction between the algorithm and the responsibility ( p = .75). Vicarious steering was associated with an increase in transitions to manual control and glances to the road but was negatively associated with driving performance immediately after the transition to manual control. Conclusion Vicarious steering is a promising indicator of driver engagement when the vehicle is under automated control and automation algorithms can promote engagement.

DeepTake: Prediction of Driver Takeover Behavior using Multimodal Data

“…Therefore, it is important to assess the drivers' visual attention and takeover readiness before the initiation of TORs. There is a proven high correlation between a driver's visual attention and eye movement [1,63,64]. DeepTake uses eye movement data (e.g., gaze position, fixation duration on areas of interest) measured by eye-tracker devices.…”

“…The main contribution of this work is the development of Deep-Take framework that predicts driver takeover intention, time and quality using vehicle data, driver biometrics and subjective measurements 1 . The intersection between ubiquitous computing, sensing and emerging technologies offers promising avenues for DeepTake to integrate modalities into a novel human-centered framework to increase the robustness of drivers' takeover behavior prediction.…”

Impact of lane keeping assist system camera misalignment on driver behavior

“…They found that drivers had an increased SDLP and decreased mean Time to Collision (TTC) after system withdrawal. Alsaid et al (2020) investigated drivers' vicarious steering behavior (steering behavior before transitions) when the automated system is fully engaged. They evaluated the relationship between vicarious steering and the quality of transitions.…”

Assessing Drivers’ Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude

“…Participants were instructed to show their dissatisfaction with the driving style of the automation with the brake and accelerator pedals. This pedal input measure builds on previous research that shows that riders’ steering input when the vehicle is under automated control indicates engagement and a propensity to take back control (Alsaid, Lee, & Price, 2019). More generally, the propensity to intervene provides a behavioral indicator of trust in automation (Meyer & Lee, 2013), which has been defined as “.…”