2013
DOI: 10.3390/robotics2020036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Object Localization Using Sound-Based Positioning System with Doppler Shift Compensation

Abstract: Sound-based positioning systems are a potential alternative low-cost navigation system. Recently, we developed such an audible sound-based positioning system, based on a spread spectrum approach. It was shown to accurately localize a stationary object. Here, we extend this localization to a moving object by compensating for the Doppler shift associated with the object movement. Numerical simulations and experiments indicate that by compensating for the Doppler shift, the system can accurately determine the pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature differences in the greenhouse in winter, as measured by the sensor method, were larger than those observed in the summer experiment (Figure 11), as were the observed positioning errors. As the desired precision was set to a minimum of 20 mm in a previous study [22], the estimated method achieved results that were more stable and closer to the desired precision than those achieved by the sensor method. Though the estimated sound velocity method assumes that sound velocity is uniformly distributed, the result shows that it can tolerate uneven sound velocity generated by large temperature differences within a small-sized greenhouse.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Conventional Temperature Sensor Methods And The Estimated Sound Velocity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temperature differences in the greenhouse in winter, as measured by the sensor method, were larger than those observed in the summer experiment (Figure 11), as were the observed positioning errors. As the desired precision was set to a minimum of 20 mm in a previous study [22], the estimated method achieved results that were more stable and closer to the desired precision than those achieved by the sensor method. Though the estimated sound velocity method assumes that sound velocity is uniformly distributed, the result shows that it can tolerate uneven sound velocity generated by large temperature differences within a small-sized greenhouse.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Conventional Temperature Sensor Methods And The Estimated Sound Velocity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, the speed of sound propagation is affected by the spatial variation of temperature within a greenhouse [21]. We hypothesize that position and a more representative mean sound velocity within the greenhouse can be simultaneously determined using a time of arrival (TOA) localization algorithm [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on Doppler shift has mainly focused on outdoor positioning systems. For instance, Slamet Widodo et al designed a GPS-based positioning system that used Doppler shift compensation for moving target positioning [41]. In their research, the Doppler shift was estimated by detecting the maximum value of the power spectrum and was then used to re-generate a new referred signal to estimate the arrival time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it must be noted that if the measured object moves with a relatively high speed, the Doppler shift cannot be neglected any more, which will influence the echo profile and seriously weaken the sequence correlation performance, making it hard to match the echo directly [20]. Typical solutions for Doppler compensation include the application of Doppler filters and optimal codes with shift multiplication characteristics [21][22][23]. However, the calculation cost is considerable for small platforms when using Doppler filters, and when utilizing the optimal codes the optimal sequences are not easy to find.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%