2021
DOI: 10.1108/pijpsm-08-2020-0140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving the needle: can training alter officer perceptions and use of de-escalation?

Abstract: PurposeDe-escalation training for police has received widespread attention as a method for reducing unnecessary and excessive use of force. There is virtually no research on de-escalation, and as a result, there is little understanding about what it is, what it includes and whether it is effective. The current study compares attitudes about the importance and use of de-escalation among officers who were randomly assigned to participate (or not) in de-escalation training.Design/methodology/approachThe current s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is currently underway to evaluate a customized de‐escalation training program designed by the Tempe (AZ) Police Department (White, 2021; White et al., 2021). Initial findings from this RCT evaluation show that both treatment and control group officers had positive attitudes toward de‐escalation tactics and self‐reported frequently using them, however, trained officers reported greater importance of compromise in encounters with citizens and using more de‐escalation tactics based on specific components of the training (i.e., compromise, maintaining officer safety, and knowing when to disengage).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is currently underway to evaluate a customized de‐escalation training program designed by the Tempe (AZ) Police Department (White, 2021; White et al., 2021). Initial findings from this RCT evaluation show that both treatment and control group officers had positive attitudes toward de‐escalation tactics and self‐reported frequently using them, however, trained officers reported greater importance of compromise in encounters with citizens and using more de‐escalation tactics based on specific components of the training (i.e., compromise, maintaining officer safety, and knowing when to disengage).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these initial studies, a number of experimental evaluations have been conducted to test for differences in administrative reports of uses of force. These include an evaluation of Polis Solutions’ T3 training program by McLean and colleagues (McLean et al, 2020 ), an evaluation of PERF’s ICAT program by Engel and colleagues (Engel et al, 2022 ), an evaluation of procedural justice training by Wood and colleagues (Wood et al, 2020 ), and an evaluation of de-escalation training by White and colleagues (White et al, 2021a , b ).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White and colleagues (White et al, 2021a , b ) recently published their evaluation of a de-escalation training program in the Tempe Police Department (TPD) that found no impact on officers’ uses of force. However, as the authors note: [A]dministrative use of force and injury data are blunt measures that might not capture the impact of the training.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much more work needs to be done to evaluate the impact of de-escalation training on outcomes such as civilian complaints and use of force. For now, agencies seeking to increase officer training on de-escalation techniques and tactics may want to explore either ICAT or T3 while the evaluation results of other trainings are ongoing (White et al, 2021).…”
Section: De-escalation Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%