2016
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moving Toward the Next Paradigm for Cardiovascular Prevention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A personalized approach in choosing therapies that provide the greatest risk reduction may indeed be the coming paradigm shift in clinical practice [21]. In this study, we demonstrated that in asymptomatic individuals with low/intermediate ASCVD risk, a benefit threshold of ARR 10 ≥2.3% identified 40% more individuals for primary prevention when compared with a risk-based approach, and that these individuals also had higher coronary plaque burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A personalized approach in choosing therapies that provide the greatest risk reduction may indeed be the coming paradigm shift in clinical practice [21]. In this study, we demonstrated that in asymptomatic individuals with low/intermediate ASCVD risk, a benefit threshold of ARR 10 ≥2.3% identified 40% more individuals for primary prevention when compared with a risk-based approach, and that these individuals also had higher coronary plaque burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…With the current shift in CVD prevention guidelines toward personalized treatment recommendations tailored to the unique benefit-harm assessment of a given patient, both quantitative CVD risk assessment and clinician-patient risk discussions are essential components of optimal CVD prevention (Robinson and Ray, 2016). However, we recently completed a systematic review that identified multiple evidence gaps pertaining to the best strategies for implementing these risk estimates in clinical practice (Karmali et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These guidelines eliminated cholesterol goals and instead identified evidence-based CVD risk thresholds to guide clinician-patient decision-making for statin initiation in primary prevention, a shift that has been recognized as the next paradigm in “personalized” CVD prevention (Robinson and Ray, 2016). This approach requires estimating 10-year CVD risk from multiple traditional risk factors including laboratory values like total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to guide risk assessment and treatment discussions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual LDL-C on statin and incremental, absolute risk reduction, both affecting numbers needed to treat, are key elements of this decision process for add-on medications [22,23]. However, fundamentally improved risk assessment, perhaps through imaging, appears to influence this decision-making process which underscores the need for further research to properly justify these strategies [21].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%