2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPC: Current practice and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
131
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…which is not numerically equivalent to (2). In particular, the representation in (3) does not guarantee conservation of g(x(t)), e.g.…”
Section: Optimization Of Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which is not numerically equivalent to (2). In particular, the representation in (3) does not guarantee conservation of g(x(t)), e.g.…”
Section: Optimization Of Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mass energy and momentum when solved numerically. We will therefore use the representation in (2) when solving the initial value problem of the fermenter model. The objective function of our optimization is given in Bolza form…”
Section: Optimization Of Dynamical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Controller tuning. Tuning of an MPC controller is, in practice, a complex task given the large number of parameters (error weight, penalty on moves, prediction horizon) that must be appropriately set [12]. Furthermore the integrators added to the model in the MPC give a deliberate plant/model mismatch which renders the analysis more complex [20].…”
Section: Control System Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How should the MPC controller be tuned and, should this be related to the regulatory control layer? [12]. This paper shows an assessment of the controllability implications of heat integration using as a case study an actual industrial process consisting of two distillation columns in series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%