2001
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MPLS using LDP and ATM VC Switching

Abstract: MPLS using LDP and ATM VC Switching Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was designed to provide a unified data-carrying service for both circuit-based clients and packet-switching clients. It can be used to carry many different kinds of traffic [3]. MPLS basic idea is to append a small fix length label before each packet in order to forward it inside the MPLS network.…”
Section: Mpls Qos Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was designed to provide a unified data-carrying service for both circuit-based clients and packet-switching clients. It can be used to carry many different kinds of traffic [3]. MPLS basic idea is to append a small fix length label before each packet in order to forward it inside the MPLS network.…”
Section: Mpls Qos Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the ATM and IP layers are managed separately. Recently, an extension of the IP technology, MPLS [27], has been discussed and is now being widely introduced. MPLS provides connection-oriented switching capability based on IP signaling protocols.…”
Section: Transport Network Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example MPLS network (2) Assume that in Fig.18, there is an established LSP R1->R2->R3->R4->R5, and the next hop changes at R2 from R3 to R6. R2 sends a request to R6 with a red thread (re,2,255).…”
Section: Fig18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be used with either the ordered downstream on-demand label allocation or ordered downstream unsolicited label allocation [2,3]. The mechanism can also be applicable to loop detection, old path retention, and load-splitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%