1989
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.3.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of liver neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the early 1980s, numerous magnetic resonance (MR) techniques have been studied to determine the optimum imaging technique for the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], but time constraints in routine clinical practice require the use of faster MR imaging methods [10 -11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the early 1980s, numerous magnetic resonance (MR) techniques have been studied to determine the optimum imaging technique for the detection and characterization of hepatic lesions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], but time constraints in routine clinical practice require the use of faster MR imaging methods [10 -11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contradistinction, other hepatic masses except for cysts show a relative decrease in signal intensity on more heavily T2-weighted images. However, on non-contrast-enhanced MRI, vascular metastases such as those from pheochromocytoma, carcinoid, and pancreatic islet cell tumors are occasionally indistinguishable from hemangioma because of their marked hyperintensity on T2-weighted images [35,36] . Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI is helpful in making this differentiation [37–40] .…”
Section: Hemangiomamentioning
confidence: 99%