2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-0004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions

Abstract: IntroductionThis article summarizes the principles and major technical aspects of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast with particular emphasis on pulse sequence parameters, contrast agent dosage, and image postprocessing. A detailed list of clinical indications for dynamic breast MR imaging is given, and an interpretation score system provided. The performance of the MR examination in terms of sensitivity and specificity for lesion detection and characterization is discussed in detail, as are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to date, because of relatively moderate specificity, breast MRI is clinically always used as adjunct to conventional mammography. The additional value of breast MRI is caused by its high sensitivity and its subsequent capacity to detect mammographically occult multifocal and multicentric disease in patients already diagnosed with breast cancer (preoperative staging), for depicting breast cancer in dense breasts tissue, for high risk screening, and for evaluation of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy [1][2][3][4][5]. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance of breast MRI is not sufficiently high to replace large-core needle biopsy for a definitive diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to date, because of relatively moderate specificity, breast MRI is clinically always used as adjunct to conventional mammography. The additional value of breast MRI is caused by its high sensitivity and its subsequent capacity to detect mammographically occult multifocal and multicentric disease in patients already diagnosed with breast cancer (preoperative staging), for depicting breast cancer in dense breasts tissue, for high risk screening, and for evaluation of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy [1][2][3][4][5]. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance of breast MRI is not sufficiently high to replace large-core needle biopsy for a definitive diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional mammography and ultrasound, MRI is the most accurate method for the detection of invasive breast cancer with sensitivity approaching 100%. Current clinical indications for breast MRI include analysis of indeterminate breast lesions detected with conventional imaging modalities, screening of women with high genetic-familial risk, preoperative staging of patients before surgery, and evaluation of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy [1][2][3][4][5]. To standardize analyses and reporting of breast MR images, the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System MR imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) lexicon was developed [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined indications include pre-surgical local tumor staging in dense breasts, surgically treated breasts in which a residual or recurrent tumor is suspected, evaluation of the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the search for occult breast cancer with known metastases, and screening of women who are at high genetic-familial risk of having breast cancer (1). Currently, breast MRI is considered to have very high (94%-99%) sensitivity for the detection of invasive cancers, but lower (50%-80%) sensitivity for the detection of in situ cancers (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nehmat Houssami et al [5] in a systematic review and meta analysis of 19 studies for the accuracy of MRI in detection of multifocal/ multicentric cancer not identified on conventional imaging observed MRI detects additional disease in 16% cases. Sardanelli et al [17] compared MRI and Mammography in detection of multifocal, multicentric cancer foci and found that the overall sensitivity was 66%(124/188) for mammography and 81%(152/188) for MRI (p<0.001); 72%(113/158) and 89%(140/158) for invasive foci (p<0.001); and 37%(11/30) and 40%(12/30) for in situ foci. Mammography and MRI missed 64 and 36 malignant foci respectively.…”
Section: Detection Of Additional Lesions On Mri With or Without Non Mmentioning
confidence: 99%