2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MR signal-fat-fraction analysis and T2* weighted imaging measure BAT reliably on humans without cold exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

12
78
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
78
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen CIT as the primary endpoint of our study because it reflects the net effect of mild cold exposure on human thermogenesis. Previously, R2* measured in the FDG‐positive region of the scBAT depot has been shown to be superior to FF in predicting metabolic activity (R 2 = 0.62 vs. R 2 = 0.4) . This might explain why measurement of R2* of the whole scBAT depot in our study was predictive of CIT, while FF was not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have chosen CIT as the primary endpoint of our study because it reflects the net effect of mild cold exposure on human thermogenesis. Previously, R2* measured in the FDG‐positive region of the scBAT depot has been shown to be superior to FF in predicting metabolic activity (R 2 = 0.62 vs. R 2 = 0.4) . This might explain why measurement of R2* of the whole scBAT depot in our study was predictive of CIT, while FF was not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…This heterogeneity is reflected by different amounts of mitochondria and thus FF and R2* per given volume. Studies that demonstrated an inverse association between FF and BAT activity based the segmentation of BAT in the MRI dataset upon volumes of interest generated by thresholding FDG‐uptake values from PET/CT or simultaneous PET/MRI scans . Placing the FF measurement into the volume with the highest FDG uptake measures mostly BAT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both of these PET/MR studies reported that cold exposure did not significantly affect FF and/or normalT2*, which, in our opinion, could be due to the limitations in the quantification methods. The first study utilized two‐echo signal‐intensity‐based method, and the second study utilized magnitude‐based pixel‐by‐pixel signal fitting, which was especially challenging due to water and fat swaps in BAT that typically has a fat fraction around 50%. Overall, these studies included heterogeneous subject populations, which may confound the analyses of BAT properties and activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies quantified active and inactive BAT on coregistered PET/CT and MRI at both thermoneutral and cold exposure temperatures . A hybrid PET/MRI BAT study revealed that FF and normalT2* (ie, reciprocal of R2*) of BAT during cold exposure and at a thermoneutral temperature correlated inversely with FDG update; however, cold exposure did not affect MRI measurements …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%