2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3200361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRD-Net: An Effective CNN-Based Segmentation Network for Surface Defect Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guo et al [25] introduced the spatial attention mechanism into U-Net, significantly improving the accuracy of the segmentation task. Lu et al [26] effectively addressed the challenge of diverse surface defects across various products by integrating multiscale features and an attention mechanism. Zhu et al [27] designed an attention mechanism that combines multi-frequency information and local cross-channel interaction to better represent and emphasize defect features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [25] introduced the spatial attention mechanism into U-Net, significantly improving the accuracy of the segmentation task. Lu et al [26] effectively addressed the challenge of diverse surface defects across various products by integrating multiscale features and an attention mechanism. Zhu et al [27] designed an attention mechanism that combines multi-frequency information and local cross-channel interaction to better represent and emphasize defect features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…algorithms through gradient calculation (that are responsive to adjacent pixel values changing rapidly), such as edge and shape detection [43]. Since these features are highly sensitive to noise and background information, they should include further abstract characterization, in order to allow accurate description and lower reconstruction error, but it is at the expense of more training data and inference time, due to the exponential growth of convolution and non-linear operations in deeper architectures [44].…”
Section: A Multi-scale and Differently Targetable Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a comparative analysis is conducted between the proposed LMFD method and other state-ofthe-art techniques on the 2D-HeLa dataset. The techniques considered for comparison include popular methods such as LBP, LPQ (Local Phase Quantization) 48 , LTP (Local Ternary Patterns) 49 , MRD (Multiscale feature fusion and Reverse attention network for Detection) 50 , and disCLBP (Discriminative Completed Local Binary Patterns) 51 . The average accuracy in more than 5-fold cross-validation is also evaluated using a suitable metric 52 .…”
Section: Applicability For Texture Feature Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%