2002
DOI: 10.1115/1.1488169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI Gradient Coil Cylinder Sound Field Simulation and Measurement

Abstract: High-field, high-speed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) generates high sound levels within and nearby the scanner. The mechanism and process that produces the gradient magnetic field (a cylindrical electro-magnet, called the gradient coil cylinder, which produces a spatially and temporally varying magnetic field inside a static background magnetic field) is the primary source of this noise. This noise can cause difficulties in verbal communication in and around the scanner, heightened patient anxiety, temporar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of the SPL along the centerline is particularly dramatic with two quiet zones at about 10 cm and Ϫ20 cm from the isocenter. These patterns are consistent with previous results (13,14 ). These two quiet zones along the centerline are more prominent in the simulation than in the measurement results, likely due again to the slight oversimplification of the model, the environment effects being ignored, and the fact that the real acoustic field is considerably more complicated than the simulated result.…”
Section: Vibro-acoustic Noise Simulation and Measurementsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variability of the SPL along the centerline is particularly dramatic with two quiet zones at about 10 cm and Ϫ20 cm from the isocenter. These patterns are consistent with previous results (13,14 ). These two quiet zones along the centerline are more prominent in the simulation than in the measurement results, likely due again to the slight oversimplification of the model, the environment effects being ignored, and the fact that the real acoustic field is considerably more complicated than the simulated result.…”
Section: Vibro-acoustic Noise Simulation and Measurementsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With the knowledge of the coil conductor pattern, electric current, and magnetic field strength, the Lorentz forces produced by each small current carrying element can be determined. The force experienced by a current carrying element, dl, due to the magnetic induction, B, is (14,20):…”
Section: Vibro-acoustic Noise Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of works have also been published which focus on the analysis of superconducting solenoids [168], as well as on full MRI scanners [154,51] and also consider the structural design of higher field scanners [64]. Acoustic effects in MRI scanners have also been investigated [224,173], with attempts to design noise reduction systems [252,253,208] and even analyse the acoustic effects in the human head [156]. Others have attempted to model these complex physical effects to aid the design of the MRI magnetic coils [101,210], to analyse the plane strain effects on superconducting solenoids [168] and the effects of the magnetic field exposure on the patient [63].…”
Section: Applications To Mri Scannersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature-caused material property variation was not considered in the simulation. For the model establishment, the element size was controlled to be less than 1/6 of the smallest wave acoustic wave length [116]. Harmonic analysis was used here from 100 Hz to 3000…”
Section: ν τ Xzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infinite acoustic boundary condition was applied on the outer surface of the surrounding air, implying that the acoustic wave was totally absorbed here with no reflection [139]. The cryostat was set to be simply supported [116]. Since the load distribution of the different coils has symmetric or anti-symmetric features, 1/8 model can be used to simulate the scanner as a whole.…”
Section: Fem Acoustic Model Of a Conventional Mri Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%