High-field, high-speed Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) generates high sound levels within and nearby the scanner. The mechanism and process that produces the gradient magnetic field (a cylindrical electro-magnet, called the gradient coil cylinder, which produces a spatially and temporally varying magnetic field inside a static background magnetic field) is the primary source of this noise. This noise can cause difficulties in verbal communication in and around the scanner, heightened patient anxiety, temporary hearing loss and possible permanent hearing impairment for health care workers and patients. In order to effectively suppress the sound radiation from the gradient coil cylinder the sound field within and nearby the gradient coil needs to be characterized This characterization may be made using an analytical solution of the sound pressure field, computational simulation, measurement analysis or some combination of these three methods. This paper presents the computational simulation and measurement results of a study of the sound radiation from a head and neck gradient coil cylinder within a 4 Tesla MRI whole body scanner. The measurement results for the sound pressure level distribution along the centerline of the gradient coil cylinder are presented. The sound pressure distributions predicted from Finite Element Analysis of the gradient coil movement during operation and subsequent Boundary Element Analysis of the sound field generated are also presented. A comparison of the measured results and the predicted results shows close agreement. Because of the extremely complex nature of the analytical solution for the gradient coil cylinder, a treatment of the analytical solution and comparison to the computational results for a simple cylinder vibrating in a purely radial direction are also presented and also show close agreement between the two methods thus validating the computational approach used with the more complex gradient coil cylinder.
The Helmholtz Equation Least Squares (HELS) method previously derived by Wang and Wu (1997) and Wu and Wang (1998) is used to reconstruct the radiated acoustic pressure fields from a complex vibrating structure. The structure under consideration is of the form of a real, full-size four-cylinder engine designed for a passenger vehicle. To simulate sound radiation from a vibrating engine block, harmonic forces are assumed to exert on two arbitrarily selected sides. The resulting vibration responses are solved by using finite element method (FEM) through a commercial software package, I-DEAS Master Series 5®. Once the normal component of surface velocity distribution is determined, the surface acoustic pressures are calculated by the Helmholtz-Kirchhoff integral theory using the standard boundary element method (BEM) codes. The radiated acoustic pressure fields are then calculated by the Helmhollz-Kirchhoff integral formulation. The results thus obtained are taken as the input to the HELS formulation to reconstruct the surface and field acoustic pressures. Numerical results show that good agreement can be obtained with relatively few measurements in the field. Further, sound pressures over the entire surface of a complex structure can be reconstructed This method is shown to be very effective at low to mid frequency ranges. The effectiveness of the HELS method may deteriorate, however, as the frequency increases. This is because the HELS method is based on an expansion of spheroidal functions, which converges slowly at high frequencies. Nonetheless, in engineering practice noise diagnostics are often carried out in the low to mid frequency ranges. Under this circumstance, the present HELS method can become a robust and effective noise diagnostic tool.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.