2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Outcomes and Effect on Patient Management

Abstract: Introduction The purpose of this study was to correlate the pathology results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided breast biopsies at our institution to MRI findings and patient clinical history characteristics. The impact of MRI-guided breast biopsies on surgical management in patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer was also assessed. Patients and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant study we retrospectively reviewed all MRI-guided breast biopsies performed 3/2006–5/2012. Clinical history, MRI featu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, many published reports on DWI have excluded lesion subgroups in most need of improved diagnostic characterization. These subtypes include lesions smaller than 10–12 mm, which account for over half of MRI findings (28) and are more likely than larger lesions to be a false-positive (28,29), and less well-defined non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions (3032), which require an expensive MRI-guidance procedure for sampling more often than masses (33).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, many published reports on DWI have excluded lesion subgroups in most need of improved diagnostic characterization. These subtypes include lesions smaller than 10–12 mm, which account for over half of MRI findings (28) and are more likely than larger lesions to be a false-positive (28,29), and less well-defined non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions (3032), which require an expensive MRI-guidance procedure for sampling more often than masses (33).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The malignancy rate in this study of women with MRI-visible breast lesions who underwent MRI-guided wire localization with subsequent surgical biopsy and MRI-guided biopsy of breast minimal lesions was 40.91% (in 13 patients who underwent MRI-guided biopsy, the malignancy rate was 23.08%, and in 74 patients with 75 eligible lesions who underwent MRI-guided wire localization with surgical biopsy, the malignancy rate was 44.0%), which is higher than the reported range of 20-35% (22)(23)(24)(25). The main difference in this study was that the majority of patients (n = 74) underwent MRI-guided wire localization with subsequent surgical biopsy (the number of suspicious lesions was 75), and only 13 patients underwent MRI-guided biopsy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For cases that have been assessed as possibly missed or discordant, a repeat biopsy or surgical excision is recommended. MRI-guided core biopsy malignancy rates varying between 16-40.91% have been reported [4,32,41,[98][99][100][101]. For benign-concordant lesions, a diagnostic follow-up MRI after 6 months of MRI-guided interventions is recommended due to the risk of false-negative results [18,50].…”
Section: Perspectives and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%