2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04063-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI radiomics in the prediction of the volumetric response in meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to subjective clinical characteristics, brain imaging biomarkers may provide more quantitative measures for sus-pected MCI (D. Yang & Hong, 2021). In this study, we developed a other feature types, such as first order, gray level co-occurrence matrix, gray level dependence matrix, gray level run length matrix, and so forth rather than being employed individually (Speckter et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to subjective clinical characteristics, brain imaging biomarkers may provide more quantitative measures for sus-pected MCI (D. Yang & Hong, 2021). In this study, we developed a other feature types, such as first order, gray level co-occurrence matrix, gray level dependence matrix, gray level run length matrix, and so forth rather than being employed individually (Speckter et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employment of wavelet transform allows for the examination of multiple scales, facilitating the enhancement of subtle contrast disparities between lesions and normal tissues. In the realm of medical image diagnostics, log‐sigma, original, and wavelet features are typically utilized in conjunction with other feature types, such as first order, gray level co‐occurrence matrix, gray level dependence matrix, gray level run length matrix, and so forth rather than being employed individually (Speckter et al., 2022 ). Textural features possess widespread utility in the field of imaging and pathology, proving particularly valuable in the realm of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From prior meningioma grading studies, it is known that multilevel feature selection can give better results. Fifteen feature selection methods were selected based on previous related research [13,31,[33][34][35][36], including the filter methods Chi-square (CHSQ), t-test (TSQ), Kruskal-Wallis H-test tests (KWH), variance (VAR), relief (RELF), mutual information (MI), minimum redundancy maximum relevance ensemble (mRMRe) and the embedded methods L1-based logistic regression (L1-LR), elastic net (EN), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), L1-based linear support vector machine (L1-SVM), random forest (RF), extra tree ensemble (ETE), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and xgboost (XGB). In this study, the filter methods were used as the first level of screening to reduce the number of features, and the embedded methods were used as the second level of screening to obtain the final features.…”
Section: Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to clinical symptoms and parameters such as age, general health, neurologic de cit, and recurrence after previous treatment, tumor size and localization have served as prognostic indicators. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) parameters were also applied to predict meningioma type, consistency, and grading, including texture analysis and machine learning techniques. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In a previous analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data measured before SRS, several DTI parameter maps, particularly Fraction Anisotropy (FA) values, correlated strongly to treatment outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%