2014
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI Surrogates for Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recently identified molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma have shown potential for improved risk stratification. We hypothesized that distinct MR imaging features can predict these subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma at one institution, with both pretherapy MR imaging and surgical tissue, served as the discovery cohort (n = 47). MR imaging features were assessed by 3 blinded neuroradiologists. NanoString-based assay of tumor tissues was co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
219
6
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
13
219
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Wnt MB is the smallest subgroup (10%) and typically arises from the dorsal brainstem and fourth ventricle as a result of activation of the WNT pathway, vital in tumor growth. It could also extend to the cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) (12). Wnt MB has the best prognosis with standard therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wnt MB is the smallest subgroup (10%) and typically arises from the dorsal brainstem and fourth ventricle as a result of activation of the WNT pathway, vital in tumor growth. It could also extend to the cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) (12). Wnt MB has the best prognosis with standard therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It accounts for 25% -30% of the MBs and has a bimodal age distribution. On imaging, the tumor is typically located in the body of the cerebellum, lateralizing to the sides of the organ (4,12,13). Raleigh et al also described the tumor as typically isointense on T2-FLAIR sequence (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies [19] classified medulloblastoma into three molecular subgroups (SHH, WNT, Non-SHH/WNT), instead of four subgroups (SHH, WNT, Group 3, and Group 4). There are two main reasons for the adoption of three subgroups: one is that Group 3 and Group 4 medulloblastoma were much less well defined and both showed neuronal/photoreceptor differentiation, and their clinical features were largely similar according to previous studies [10][11][12][18][19][20][21][22] . Another reason is the lack of reliable, rapid techniques to differentiate Group 3 and Group 4 [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason is the lack of reliable, rapid techniques to differentiate Group 3 and Group 4 [18] . Transcriptome profiling analysis remains as the gold standard in molecular subgrouping [21] . Although IHC is a method that can be applied for molecular classification, it is limited by the absence of reliable IHC markers to differentiate Group 3 and Group 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation