2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MSFLA/GHS/SFLA-GHS/SDE algorithms for economic dispatch problem considering multiple fuels and valve point loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This table reveals that the best cost of MSFS has equally optimal solution quality with eight compared methods and lower cost than two other ones, such as ELANN [10] and IQPSO [28]. However, MSFS is ranked at the first position amongst these methods because of having the lowest value of N Ger with 1.200 while AIS [12] and MPSO [27] have used 3000, DE [5] has used 12.000, IQPSO [28] has used 40.000, and MSFLA, GHS, SFLA-GHS, and SDE [38] have used 9.000. Clearly, MSFS is the standout method with the lowest evaluation for these four cases.…”
Section: Test System 3 With 10 Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This table reveals that the best cost of MSFS has equally optimal solution quality with eight compared methods and lower cost than two other ones, such as ELANN [10] and IQPSO [28]. However, MSFS is ranked at the first position amongst these methods because of having the lowest value of N Ger with 1.200 while AIS [12] and MPSO [27] have used 3000, DE [5] has used 12.000, IQPSO [28] has used 40.000, and MSFLA, GHS, SFLA-GHS, and SDE [38] have used 9.000. Clearly, MSFS is the standout method with the lowest evaluation for these four cases.…”
Section: Test System 3 With 10 Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many researchers have chosen outstanding algorithms and combined them to create new algorithms with more promising results than the original algorithms. For this purpose, many articles have productively introduced and launched highly effective algorithms for the ELD problem, such as hybrid PSO with real-valued mutation (RVM-PSO) [35], combination of the differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithms (DEPSO) [36], hybrid PSO with gravitational search algorithm (HPSO-GSA) [37], modified shuffled frog leaping algorithm (MSFLA) [38], global best harmony search algorithm (GHS) [38], hybrid SFLA-GHS algorithm [38], combination of hybrid SFLA-GH and shuffled differential evolution (MSFLA/GHS/SFLA-GHS/SDE) [38], hybrid fuzzy adaptive chaotic ant swarm optimization (FCASO) algorithm and sequential quadratic programming (SQP) technique (FCASO-SQP) [39], a new hybridization of particle swarm optimization with dynamic linkage discovery (PSO-RDL) [40], hybrid ant colony optimization and real-coded genetic algorithm (GAAIP) [41] and shuffled differential evolution (SED) [42]. All of the previous methods showed that they were powerful and effective techniques that could deal with most of such difficulties of classical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 1-4 indicate the power generation schedule and generation cost obtained by the proposed SDE for the load demands of 2700 MW, 2600 MW, 2500 MW, and 2400 MW respectively. In Table 1, the effectiveness of SDE in solving convex PED problem, for the power demand of 2700 MW, has been validated by comparing its results with other optimizers in the literature such as Modified Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm (MSFLA) [40], Modified Hopfield Neural Network (MHNN) [41], Self-adaptive Differential Evolution (SaDE) [32], and Improved Evolutionary Programming (IEP) [42]. Similarly, Table 2 shows the simulation result of SDE for the power demand of 2600 MW, compared with Hopfield Lagrange Network (HLN) [43], Lamda-Iteration (LI) [43], and SaDE [32].…”
Section: System 1: 10 Machine Multiple Fuel Convex Ped (Without Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…of iterations = 800, Crossover rate (CR) = 0.6, Mutation factor (MF) = 0.5 and the results are presented after 30 trials. Table 6 shows the results obtained from the proposed SDE in solving non-convex PED problem for the 2700 MW power demand and are compared to other optimizers in literature such as Improved Genetic Algorithm with Multiplier Updating (IGA_MU) [28], Modified Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm (MSFLA) [40], Particle Swarm 1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 105 113 121 129 137 145 153 161 169 177 185 193 2400MW 2500MW 2600 MW Figure 5. Convergence-characteristics of SBE algorithm for system 1 (without valve point loading effects), P d = 2400 MW, 2500 MW, 2600 MW.…”
Section: System 2: 10 Machine Multiple Fuel Non-convex Ped (With Valvmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation