2012
DOI: 10.1002/mus.23327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MUAP values of two facial muscles in normal subjects and comparison of two methods for data analysis

Abstract: The set of normal values for frontalis and mentalis in this study could be useful in routine practice. Careful manual editing of the frontalis MUAPs is recommended for more accurate determination of their duration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using linear mixed models for statistical analysis we could overcome this limitation and found a significant correlation between quantitative EMG data and time course of reinnervation. Recordings from different healthy normal facial muscles reveal different MUP patterns as it has been shown in the present study and by Papagianni et al 11 To overcome the variability related to the investigated muscles, a z-score transformation was performed which is an established method for quantitative MUP analyses. 12 Here we did not record evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) which might give more detailed insights into the remodeling of the motor units during nerve regeneration compared with MUP analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Using linear mixed models for statistical analysis we could overcome this limitation and found a significant correlation between quantitative EMG data and time course of reinnervation. Recordings from different healthy normal facial muscles reveal different MUP patterns as it has been shown in the present study and by Papagianni et al 11 To overcome the variability related to the investigated muscles, a z-score transformation was performed which is an established method for quantitative MUP analyses. 12 Here we did not record evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) which might give more detailed insights into the remodeling of the motor units during nerve regeneration compared with MUP analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%