2015
DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Much Obliged: Volunteering, Normative Activities, and Willingness to Serve on Juries

Abstract: Although compulsory, many people treat jury duty as voluntary. This article examines the conceptual and empirical links between participating in voluntary activity and stated willingness to serve on a jury. We also consider the role of engaging in other normative behaviors. Analysis of 1,304 US citizens in the Survey of Texas Adults showed an initial relationship between volunteering and willingness to serve, net of personal resources, prior jury service, and prosocial attitudes. However, indicators of normati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will create different likelihoods of responding to a summons or qualification questionnaire and being willing to serve, even across federal versus state jurisdictions. Stated willingness to serve is particularly low among African Americans, for reasons that are not yet well understood (Musick et al ), but willingness varies greatly across neighborhoods even within the same city (Taylor et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will create different likelihoods of responding to a summons or qualification questionnaire and being willing to serve, even across federal versus state jurisdictions. Stated willingness to serve is particularly low among African Americans, for reasons that are not yet well understood (Musick et al ), but willingness varies greatly across neighborhoods even within the same city (Taylor et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has shown that, on average, relative to whites, blacks and Hispanics have increased perceptions of criminal injustice (Hagan, Shedd, and Payne 2005) in relation to the police (Weitzer and Tuch 2005) and the courts (Brooks and Jeon-Slaughter 2001; Overby et al 2005) and are more likely to perceive the criminal justice system as racially biased (Bobo and Johnson 2004; Bobo and Thompson 2006), largely due to greater contact with the legal system (Hagan, Shedd, and Payne 2005; Weitzer and Tuch 2005; Muller and Schrage 2014). Jury deliberations may be yet another site in which these differential views are perpetuated (Diamond 1993), as blacks express less willingness to serve on a jury than whites, even controlling for prior jury experience (Musick et al 2015). In sum, a consideration of whether subjective experiences of jury deliberations vary by status characteristics contributes to our understandings of trust in legal institutions and of juries as an inclusionary deliberative body.…”
Section: Jurors' Well-being: From Objective To Subjective Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers examine determinants of prosocial behaviors such as giving money, food and water, clothing and footwear, as well as the statistical numbers and percentage of people who would engage in helping behaviors (Musick, Rose, Dury, & Rose, 2015;Taniguchi & Marshall, 2014). One survey conducted in the United States showed that 23% of respondents would engage in providing help to vulnerable people, 34% would volunteer, and 22% would provide assistance to first responders if needed (FEMA, 2009: 12).…”
Section: Literary Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%