2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mucoid switch in Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: Triggers, molecular mechanisms and implications in pathogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third mechanism is a combination of both in which repression of bce genes expression could be achieved by lowering the number of regulatory proteins and by increasing of H-NS proteins at the promoter regions of those bce genes. So far, only two response regulators, OmpR and NtrC, from the signal transduction systems EnvZ/OmpR and NtrB/NtrC, respectively, have been implicated in the regulation of cepacian biosynthesis in Burkholderia (12,13,35), but it is unknown whether these regulators bind directly to the bce gene regions or not. The expression data presented here shows that neither ompR nor ntrC genes are differentially expressed in 17616nmv compared with the wild-type strain, suggesting that repression by Bmul_0158 H-NS-like protein at the bce promoters is the most likely mechanism for cepacian biosynthesis regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third mechanism is a combination of both in which repression of bce genes expression could be achieved by lowering the number of regulatory proteins and by increasing of H-NS proteins at the promoter regions of those bce genes. So far, only two response regulators, OmpR and NtrC, from the signal transduction systems EnvZ/OmpR and NtrB/NtrC, respectively, have been implicated in the regulation of cepacian biosynthesis in Burkholderia (12,13,35), but it is unknown whether these regulators bind directly to the bce gene regions or not. The expression data presented here shows that neither ompR nor ntrC genes are differentially expressed in 17616nmv compared with the wild-type strain, suggesting that repression by Bmul_0158 H-NS-like protein at the bce promoters is the most likely mechanism for cepacian biosynthesis regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the regulation of bce genes´ expression directing cepacian biosynthesis is not yet fully understood, the NtrBC signal transduction system and the alternative sigma factor σ 54 have been implicated in regulating their expression in B. cenocepacia H111. In B. multivorans, another signal transduction system, EnvZ/OmpR, was identified as responsible for EPS biosynthesis, as nonmucoid colonies obtained under stress conditions accumulated mutations in ompR gene (12,13). The possible involvement of sRNAs in cepacian biosynthesis regulation comes from the observation that a mutant in the B. contaminans IST408 RNA chaperone Hfq produces 50% less EPS than the wild-type strain, although no specific sRNA has been identified (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burkholderia gladioli contains a genome made up of 9.05 Mb, two chromosomes and four plasmids, suggesting that the size of its genome is related to its ability to colonize different ecological niches (Mannaa et al, 2018). In addition, Burkholderia sensu lato has different virulence factors such as type I, II, III, IV and V secretion systems, adhesins, pilis, siderophores, extracellular proteases, various polysaccharides, and quorum sensing molecules (Ferreira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Fully Bilingualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Burkholderia strains of the Burkholderia cepacia complex ( Bcc ), this is the main exopolysaccharide produced ( Cescutti et al, 2000 ; Conway et al, 2004 ; Ferreira et al, 2007 ; Cuzzi et al, 2014 ). In this group of opportunistic pathogens that can cause lung infections in cystic fibrosis (CF), immunocompromised or granulomatous disease patients, CEP was associated with bacterial persistence in the lung ( Conway et al, 2004 ; Cunha et al, 2004 ; Sousa et al, 2007 ; Zlosnik et al, 2011 ; Ferreira et al, 2019 ) and shown to act as a protective barrier against antibiotics and other stresses such as oxidative stress, desiccation, and metal ion stress ( Bylund et al, 2006 ; Benincasa et al, 2009 ; Ferreira et al, 2010 , 2011 ; Cuzzi et al, 2012 ). Importantly, many of these potentially pathogenic Bcc strains, which produce CEP, are also naturally associated with plants ( Coenye and Vandamme, 2003 ; Eberl and Vandamme, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bcc members and other animal and plant pathogenic non- Bcc isolates, CEP is synthetized by two gene clusters ( bce -I and bce -II, for B. cepacia exopolysaccharide), which are separated by 130 to 314 kb ( Ferreira et al, 2010 ). Interestingly, in the genome of environmental strains previously belonging to the Burkholderia genus (e.g., P. phymatum STM815, P. xenovorans LB400, P. phytofirmans PsJN, P. graminis C4D1M, and Caballeronia glathei DSM 50014), the CEP genes are not separated, but are organized as a continuous gene cluster ( Moreira et al, 2003 ; Ferreira et al, 2010 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%