1997
DOI: 10.5565/rev/papers.1859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mujeres sentenciadas por homicidio en la ciudad de México

Abstract: ResumenEl articulo aborda de manera sintética 10s resultados de un estudio comparativo emprendido entre hombres y mujeres sentenciados por homicidio en la Ciudad de México, enfocando particularmente la situación de las mujeres.El estudio incluyó la revisión de 400 expedientes de hombres sentenciados por homic i d i~, que representan al 43 por ciento de 10s convictos por este delito en la ciudad de México. Nuestra muestra comprendió también a las 50 mujeres sentenciadas por homicidio en esta ciudad. Ademk de ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, they have depicted it as the domain of young men, often poor and uneducated, acting in surroundings of concentrated disadvantage and substance use, and in a cultural context that overemphasizes honor and masculinity (Briceño-León, 2008; Briceño-León & Zubillaga, 2002; Cruz, 1999; Doubova, Pámanes-González, Billings, & Torres-Arreola, 2007; Duque & Montoya, 2013; González-Pérez, Vega-López, Vega-López, Muñoz-De-La-Torre, & Cabrera-Pivaral, 2009; López, Híjar, Rascón, & Blanco, 1996; Neapolitan, 1994; Soo, 2011; Winton, 2004). The scarce research conducted in Mexico City suggests that this characterization is broadly accurate, as most homicides in previous decades were predominantly expressive in nature and mostly the result of brawls or altercations between young males acting on impulse and attempting to assert physical superiority (Azaola, 1997; Quiroz, 1957). This characterization is not necessarily particular to the Latin American or Mexican contexts.…”
Section: Contextualizing Expressive and Instrumental Homicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, they have depicted it as the domain of young men, often poor and uneducated, acting in surroundings of concentrated disadvantage and substance use, and in a cultural context that overemphasizes honor and masculinity (Briceño-León, 2008; Briceño-León & Zubillaga, 2002; Cruz, 1999; Doubova, Pámanes-González, Billings, & Torres-Arreola, 2007; Duque & Montoya, 2013; González-Pérez, Vega-López, Vega-López, Muñoz-De-La-Torre, & Cabrera-Pivaral, 2009; López, Híjar, Rascón, & Blanco, 1996; Neapolitan, 1994; Soo, 2011; Winton, 2004). The scarce research conducted in Mexico City suggests that this characterization is broadly accurate, as most homicides in previous decades were predominantly expressive in nature and mostly the result of brawls or altercations between young males acting on impulse and attempting to assert physical superiority (Azaola, 1997; Quiroz, 1957). This characterization is not necessarily particular to the Latin American or Mexican contexts.…”
Section: Contextualizing Expressive and Instrumental Homicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el rubro de género y delito, un texto que aporta en esa dirección es el de Azaola (1997), quien analiza las diferencias en los homicidios cuando son cometidos por hombres o por mujeres. Esa autora se pregunta si unos u otras representan de la misma manera la comisión de delitos violentos; también se interroga sobre el tipo de víctimas que escogen ellos o ellas, así como las motivaciones de varones y mujeres para perpetrar esos hechos, y si las personas reciben el mismo trato por parte de la justicia, con independencia de su sexo.…”
Section: Estudiosdegenerocolmexmx E-issn 2395-9185unclassified
“…Finally, other scholars have established that the type of defence is not the primary determinant on the results of a legal process, but rather the sociodemographic characteristics of the accused, i.e. age, gender and social class (Azaola, 1997; Spohn, Gruhl and Welch, 1982). According to this stance, the efficacy of public defence is implicitly affected by certain subjective elements that influence the preconceptions held by the judicial system with respect to certain populations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%