2021
DOI: 10.1090/proc/15401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mullins-Sekerka as the Wasserstein flow of the perimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is different and inspired by the work of Simon and one of the authors [LS18] who derive the sharp-interface limit of a system of Allen-Cahn equations, a second-order version of our problem here. On a conceptual level, our proof of the second main result is also similar to the work by Chambolle and one of the authors [CL21] who showed that the implicit time discretization of the Hele-Shaw flow produces varifold solutions which are slightly weaker than the solutions considered here. Jacobs, Meszaros, and Kim [JKM21] introduced a thresholding-type scheme, similar to this implicit time discretization and proved its convergence to a weak solution under an energy convergence assumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our approach is different and inspired by the work of Simon and one of the authors [LS18] who derive the sharp-interface limit of a system of Allen-Cahn equations, a second-order version of our problem here. On a conceptual level, our proof of the second main result is also similar to the work by Chambolle and one of the authors [CL21] who showed that the implicit time discretization of the Hele-Shaw flow produces varifold solutions which are slightly weaker than the solutions considered here. Jacobs, Meszaros, and Kim [JKM21] introduced a thresholding-type scheme, similar to this implicit time discretization and proved its convergence to a weak solution under an energy convergence assumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We remark that one could also consider the one-phase model for the Mullins-Sekerka as in [9] in the whole R 2 and expect the above convergence to hold also in this case. We also expect the convergence of the sets in Theorem 1.3 to hold with respect to Hausdorff distance but we do not prove it here.…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We remark that one could also consider the one-phase model for the Mullins-Sekerka as in [8] in the whole R 2 and expect the above convergence to hold also in this case. We also expect the convergence of the sets in Theorem 1.3 to hold with respect to Hausdorff distance but we do not prove it here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%