2020
DOI: 10.1108/ecam-12-2019-0726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-agent based safety computational experiment system for shield tunneling projects

Abstract: PurposeIn shield tunneling projects, human, shield machine and underground environment are tightly coupled and interacted. Accidents often occur under dysfunctional interactions among them. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a multi-agent based safety computational experiment system (SCES) and use it to identify the main influential factors of various aspects of human, shield machine and underground environment.Design/methodology/approachThe methods mainly comprised computational experiments and multi-agent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the available literature, safety risk factors are classified using the same taxonomy. To illustrate, Lu et al [62] and Zhou et al [63] separated safety risk factors into hydrogeological safety risk factors, equipment safety risk factors, construction technology safety risk factors, and personnel safety risk factors by adhering to this type of classification. As was previously mentioned, the taxonomy does not include material-type safety risk factors because, in practice, non-standard materials cannot be brought onto construction sites due to the strict three-level review system, and damage to materials at work sites is frequently brought on by inadvertent working procedures, during which personnel-type, equipment-type, and technique-type safety risks can cover the related risks.…”
Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the available literature, safety risk factors are classified using the same taxonomy. To illustrate, Lu et al [62] and Zhou et al [63] separated safety risk factors into hydrogeological safety risk factors, equipment safety risk factors, construction technology safety risk factors, and personnel safety risk factors by adhering to this type of classification. As was previously mentioned, the taxonomy does not include material-type safety risk factors because, in practice, non-standard materials cannot be brought onto construction sites due to the strict three-level review system, and damage to materials at work sites is frequently brought on by inadvertent working procedures, during which personnel-type, equipment-type, and technique-type safety risks can cover the related risks.…”
Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vandatikhaki et al (2017) created an architecture that combines the Location-based Guidance Systems (LGS) technology with security management knowledge, proposed a security mechanism that can achieve two types of responses, and demonstrated that the system can improve the coordination between construction equipment and prevent collision accidents through a case study. In addition, Lu et al (2020) analyzed the main influencing factors of the imbalance between shield machines, humans and the environment, and safety performance in tunnel construction by developing an agent-based safety system. This system can identify risk factors, and the effectiveness of the system was also verified.…”
Section: Safety Performance Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach forms a comprehensive construction risk control method for petroleum engineering. Prior research has employed multi-agent technology to investigate engineering risks, including the identification of the main risk factors of shield tunnelling projects using a safety computational experiment system and the simulation of various risk control strategies for construction projects using a risk evolution model based on multi-agent modelling and stochastic methods [ 31 , 32 ]. Multi-agent-based collaborative emergency decision-making algorithms have also been proposed for emergency response to traffic accidents, and simulation modeling of human-machine-environment-related risk factors in coal mines has been conducted using multi-agent technology [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%