2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-angular reflectance spectra of small single trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spectra of four tree species could be compared with previous studies and were noted to have similar shape and level of reflectance: silver birch (Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002), Norway spruce (Forsström et al, 2021; Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002; Williams, 1991), Scots pine (Forsström et al, 2021; Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002), and black alder (Clasen et al, 2015; Kuusk et al, 2013). Notably, VIS–NIR stem bark spectra of littleleaf linden, English oak, European ash, gray alder, Norway maple, and European aspen have not been previously published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spectra of four tree species could be compared with previous studies and were noted to have similar shape and level of reflectance: silver birch (Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002), Norway spruce (Forsström et al, 2021; Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002; Williams, 1991), Scots pine (Forsström et al, 2021; Juola et al, 2020; Lang et al, 2002), and black alder (Clasen et al, 2015; Kuusk et al, 2013). Notably, VIS–NIR stem bark spectra of littleleaf linden, English oak, European ash, gray alder, Norway maple, and European aspen have not been previously published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there are considerable differences in bark spectra depending on tree species (Hadlich et al, 2018), bark moisture content (Elvidge, 1990), or position of the woody material in the canopy (Juola et al, 2020). The majority of previous studies that analyzed the variability of bark spectra were based on measurements of detached pieces of bark, which were conducted in the laboratory with a spectrometer and an integrating sphere (Asner, 1998; Campbell & Borden, 2005; Forsström et al, 2021; Roberts et al, 2004; Williams, 1991), whereas less research has been conducted outdoors for bark on living trees (Girma et al, 2013; Hadlich et al, 2018). Better understanding of bark optical properties in their natural state and environment would provide valuable and complementary knowledge to studies conducted in the laboratory with destructive sampling that require the cutting of branches or felling of trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the reflectance of vegetatio in leaf-off seasons was considerably lower than that in leaf-on seasons, and the reflectan of the green band (band 3) was approximately 10% in leaf-on seasons and <10% in leaf-o seasons. Our results demonstrate that the synergetic use of leaf-on and -off imageries ma provide more spectral information for LCZ mapping and can help in the identification LCZ se ings [111,112]. Figure 16 compares LCZ classification results using leaf-on imageries, leaf-off imageries, and integrating leaf-on and leaf-off imageries.…”
Section: Synergetic Use Of Leaf-on and -Off Imageriesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…spatial arrangement of trees) and multiple scattering driven by vegetation structure as well as mutual shadowing between trees and the fraction of soil (Li and Strahler, 1992, Zeng et al, 2009). This may lead to reflectance differences between data from tree crowns and vegetation canopies (Forsström et al, 2021), thus influencing the distribution of hyperspectral reflectance-based physiological traits. The availability of sub-meter resolution imagery and LiDAR data allows a better characterization of target trees, removing shadow and background contributions (Asner et al, 2007), and capturing the spectral variability within and among crowns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%