Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information

Abstract. There is a number of criteria and associated sub-criteria influencing the match of managers to construction projects. Criteria and sub-criteria were identified based on a thorough review of the related literature and interviews of management personnel involved in the project managers selection. Project managers characteristics are considered to be less important for an effective project management. The model is based on multicriteria evaluation of project managers. The evaluation embraces the identified criteria influencing the process of construction project manager selection. This paper considers the application of grey relations methodology to defining the utility of alternatives, and offers a multiple criteria method of COmplex PRoportional ASsessment of alternatives with grey relations (COPRAS-G) for analysis. In this model, the parameters of the alternatives are determined by the grey relational grade and expressed in terms of intervals. A case study presents the selection of construction project manager. The results obtained show that this method may be used as an effective decision aid in multicriteria selection.

show abstract

“…Lin and Lee (2007) proposed a novel forecasting model. Lin et al (2008) presented subcontractor selection model by applying grey TOPSIS method.…”

Section: Multicriteria Selection Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicriteria Selection of Project Managers by Applying Grey Criteria / Projektų Valdytojo Parinkimo Daugiatikslio Vertinimo Modelis

Zavadskas

Turskis

Tamošaitienė

et al. 2008

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Artan rekabet ortamında, çok yönlü teknoloji gerektiren ürünlere olan talebin artması ile karmaşık üretim teknikleri, yüksek tasarım ve kalifiye eleman gerekliliği firmaları alt yüklenicilerle işbirliğine itmiştir [ [17], sonraki çalışmalarında aynı problem ve yöntemler için çok dönemli durumda dinamik karar verme yaklaşımı önermişlerdir. Radziszewska [18], inşaat sektöründe alt yüklenici seçimi problemini ELECTRE III yöntemi ile çözümlemiştir.…”

Section: Review)unclassified

Bi̇r Savunma Sanayi̇ Fi̇rmasinda Çok Kri̇terli̇ Alt Yükleni̇ci̇ Seçi̇m Problemi̇ Ve Çözümü

Can¹,

Arikan²

2014

Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZETBu çalışmada, savunma sanayi sektöründe ARGE çalışmaları gerçekleştiren bir firmanın, yatırımlarında birlikte çalışacağı alt yüklenici firmayı seçim ve değerlendirme problemine çözüm getirilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Alt yüklenicilik, bir işin bir parçasının önceden belirlenen şartlara uygun olarak, özel yeteneklerini ve kaynaklarını kullanarak daha iyi yapabilecek bir başka firmadan transfer edilmesidir. Alt yüklenici seçim probleminde, maliyetin yanı sıra; teknik gereksinimler, deneyim, garanti süresi, teslim zamanı gibi birden çok kriterin dikkate alınması, elde edilecek çözümün gerçekçi ve uygulanabilir olması açısından zaruri öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmada problemin çözümü, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses (AHP) ve Promethee II yöntemlerinin bütünleşik kullanımı ile elde edilmiştir. Karar verici için uygun kriter ağırlıkları AHP ile belirlenmiş ve alternatif alt yüklenicilerin en iyiden en kötüye doğru sıralaması Promethee II ile elde edilmiştir. Aynı zamanda seçilen alternatifin her bir kriter bazında değerlendirilmesi yapılarak firmanın alt yüklenici firma için geri besleme yapabileceği bilgiler elde edilmiştir. AHP yöntemi ile elde edilen kriter ağırlıklarındaki değişimin sıralamaya etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma ile bir milli savunma bir projesinin gerçekleştirilmesinde ve yürütülmesinde kritik öneme sahip alt yüklenicinin en etkin şekilde seçimi ve değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır.Anahtar Kelimeler: Alt Yüklenici Seçimi, Promethee, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV). MULTI CRITERIA SUBCONTRACTOR SELECTION PROBLEM AND ITS SOLUTION FOR A DEFENCE INDUSTRY FIRM ABSTRACTThis study aims to solve the problem of selecting and evaluating a subcontractor firm for a company that performs research and development activities in defense industry. Subcontractoring means that part of the work is transferred from another company that has special skills or resources that allow it to perform tasks clearly specified in better conditions. During the selection process, considering multiple criteria such as technical requirements of the work, experience of the suncontractor firm, warranty conditions, delivery time, as well as costs is crucial to obtain a realistic and implementable solution. In this study, the solution of the problem is gathered by utilizing the integration of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Promethee II method which are multi-criteria decision making methods. Decision Maker's criteria weights are determined by AHP. The ranking of alternatives are obtained Promethee II. The evaluation of the selected alternative on the basis of each criterion is utilized which provides feedback to impove the subcontractor firm. Weight Stability Interval Analysis is performed to investigate impacts of the changes in the weights of criteria determined by AHP on the ranking. As a result, this study provides the most efective selection and evaluation of a subcontractor which is critically important for a national defense research & development...

show abstract

“…An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making is analysed by Shih et al (2007) and incremental analysis of MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS is developed by Shih (2008). Lin et al (2008) applied TOPSIS method with grey number operations.…”

Section: Madm Methods For Solving the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/5898

Zavadskas

Turskis

Tamošaitienė

2010

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

374

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The paper presents risk assessment of construction projects. The assessment is based on the multi-attribute decision-making methods. The risk evaluation attributes are selected taking into consideration the interests and goals of the stakeholders as well as factors that have influence on the construction process efficiency and real estate value. Ranking of objects and determination of their optimality are determined by applying TOPSIS grey and COPRAS-G methods with attributes values determined at intervals. A background and a description of the proposed model are provided and key findings of the analysis are presented.

show abstract

Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information

Cited by 122 publications

References 39 publications

Multicriteria Selection of Project Managers by Applying Grey Criteria / Projektų Valdytojo Parinkimo Daugiatikslio Vertinimo Modelis

Multicriteria Selection of Project Managers by Applying Grey Criteria / Projektų Valdytojo Parinkimo Daugiatikslio Vertinimo Modelis

Bi̇r Savunma Sanayi̇ Fi̇rmasinda Çok Kri̇terli̇ Alt Yükleni̇ci̇ Seçi̇m Problemi̇ Ve Çözümü

https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/5898

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About