2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9471-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-centre variability of ISCEV standard ERGs in two normal adults

Abstract: Inter-centre amplitude variability was typically within clinically significant thresholds, suggesting that inter-centre variability with suitable standardisation may not add more to total variability than inter-subject variability. Variability improvements gained by the tighter specifications of the ISCEV-specified protocol were possibly more than lost due to imprecisions of xenon flashtubes. Peak time variability was far lower than amplitude variability, corresponding with acceptable variability of biochemica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction found in peak-to-peak amplitudes recorded with skin electrodes in our study is consistent with previous reports of reductions of 75% and 80% (9) , 43%-73% (10) , 50%-70% (11) , 50% (12) , 23%-62% (13) , and 42%-57% (14) . Our data showed reductions between 46% and 62% on the peak-to-peak amplitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The reduction found in peak-to-peak amplitudes recorded with skin electrodes in our study is consistent with previous reports of reductions of 75% and 80% (9) , 43%-73% (10) , 50%-70% (11) , 50% (12) , 23%-62% (13) , and 42%-57% (14) . Our data showed reductions between 46% and 62% on the peak-to-peak amplitudes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the implicit times decrease with increasing stimulus strength. The absolute values of the scotopic a-and b-wave amplitudes measured with 3 cd·s m −2 flashes agree with those measured in humans at the same conditions (Hamilton et al, 2015). The implicit time of the a-wave at the same flash strength was also similar to those measured in human subjects.…”
Section: Feasibility Study 321 Ergssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The implicit time of the a-wave at the same flash strength was also similar to those measured in human subjects. The latency of the b-wave was, however, shorter (35 ms) than those measured by Hamilton et al (2015) in human subjects (about 50 ms). In general, the responses to the different flash intensities are comparable to those measured in cynomolgus monkeys (Table 2).…”
Section: Feasibility Study 321 Ergscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Estimates of heritability tended to be higher for response amplitudes than for implicit times, with almost all amplitudes having a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for heritability that exceeded 50%. This is intriguing because implicit times tend to show less intersession and interlaboratory variability than response amplitudes, 23 suggesting that measurement error would be greater in amplitude quantification rather than implicit time. Measurement errors act as individual (i.e., unique) environmental factors in twin studies, and so would reduce estimates of heritability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%