2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6898-0_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi Class Machine Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection - A Performance Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a bat algorithm was utilized to optimize the ensemble model. Belavagi and Muniyal [73] identified that RF outperforms SVM, Gaussian naïve Bayes, and logistic regression for classification of a normal behavior and four classes of attacks (i.e., denial of service (DoS), remote to local (R2L), probe and user to root (U2R) attacks) for intrusion detection. Rodda and Erothi [63] discussed a class imbalance problem in IDSs and also identified that RF outperforms naïve Bayes, Bayes network, and C4.5 for classification of a normal behavior and four classes of attacks using the NSL-KDD dataset.…”
Section: Mapping Selected Studies By Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a bat algorithm was utilized to optimize the ensemble model. Belavagi and Muniyal [73] identified that RF outperforms SVM, Gaussian naïve Bayes, and logistic regression for classification of a normal behavior and four classes of attacks (i.e., denial of service (DoS), remote to local (R2L), probe and user to root (U2R) attacks) for intrusion detection. Rodda and Erothi [63] discussed a class imbalance problem in IDSs and also identified that RF outperforms naïve Bayes, Bayes network, and C4.5 for classification of a normal behavior and four classes of attacks using the NSL-KDD dataset.…”
Section: Mapping Selected Studies By Ensemble Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a different front, Ghafir et al [16] introduced MLAPT for intrusion detection, leveraging a private dataset. It is important to consider that the utilization of a non-public dataset may have implications for the model's accuracy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSL-KDD is a public dataset, which has been developed from the previous KDD99 dataset [22]. A statistical analysis performed on KDD99 dataset raised important issues that significantly affect the accuracy of intrusion detection and lead to a misleading evaluation of AIDS Belavagi et al [36] discussed the prediction analysis of different supervised ML algorithms namely Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and Random Forest using NSL-KDD dataset. Experimental results showed that the Random Forest achieved very good performance in identifying Dos, Probe, and U2R attacks, but it was poor in the identification of R2L attacks.…”
Section: Nsl-kdd Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%