2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.919186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction Challenge—Assessing Brain MRI Reconstruction Models and Their Generalizability to Varying Coil Configurations

Abstract: Deep-learning-based brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction methods have the potential to accelerate the MRI acquisition process. Nevertheless, the scientific community lacks appropriate benchmarks to assess the MRI reconstruction quality of high-resolution brain images, and evaluate how these proposed algorithms will behave in the presence of small, but expected data distribution shifts. The multi-coil MRI (MC-MRI) reconstruction challenge provides a benchmark that aims at addressing these issue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the main experiments on downsampled data, it takes U-net+FBP approximately 10 s to reconstruct volumes for both geometries, while Uformer+FBP takes approximately 50 s. PDHG takes 14 min to reconstruct a small FOV volume and 18 min to reconstruct a large FOV volume 8 .…”
Section: Inference Times and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the main experiments on downsampled data, it takes U-net+FBP approximately 10 s to reconstruct volumes for both geometries, while Uformer+FBP takes approximately 50 s. PDHG takes 14 min to reconstruct a small FOV volume and 18 min to reconstruct a large FOV volume 8 .…”
Section: Inference Times and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, reconstruction methods based on deep learning have attracted a lot of interest in the community and demonstrated very promising results in public reconstruction challenges. For example, in the recent MRI reconstruction challenges 7,8 deep learning methods have strongly outperformed the classical baselines. Generally speaking, any medical image reconstruction task can be viewed as an abstract inverse problem for a suitable forward operator, and different approaches have been proposed in the literature for solving such problems with deep learning 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this challenge, reconstruction using one quarter of the typically acquired data was selected as the objective inspired by the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction challenges(Matthew J. Muckley et al, 2021; Youssef Beauferris et al, 2022) and the quality limitations of GABA-edited MRS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The j th sub-band of an image I is approximated by blurring I using a zero-meaned Gaussian kernel with σ 2 ∝ 2 J−j and downsampling the image by factor 2 j . σ 2 N is a parameter of the vision model and was chosen as 0.4 for MRI images 190 . The VIF is bounded by 0, but can reach values greater than one if the reconstructed image shows less noise or improved contrast compared to the target image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Calgary-Campinas multi-channel MR dataset 190 is an open, 2D brain MRI dataset providing 12-channel k-space of 167 volunteers, acquired using a T 1 -weighted gradient-recalled echo sequence (TE=2.6-3.1 ms, TR=6.3-7.4 ms, TI=400-650 ms). The MRI was acquired using a 3T system at 1 mm 3 isotropic resolution.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%