2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574715000995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-contact bipedal robotic locomotion

Abstract: This paper presents a formal framework for achieving multi-contact bipedal robotic walking, and realizes this methodology experimentally on two robotic platforms: AMBER2 and Assume The Robot Is A Sphere (ATRIAS). Inspired by the key feature encoded in human walkingmulti-contact behavior-this approach begins with the analysis of human locomotion and uses it to motivate the construction of a hybrid system model representing a multi-contact robotic walking gait. Human-inspired outputs are extracted from reference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HZD-based controllers have been validated numerically and experimentally for (i) 2D and 3D bipedal robots, including RABBIT [17,18], MA-BEL [19][20][21], ERNIE [22], AMBER [23], ATRIAS [24][25][26][27], and DURUS [28,29] prototypes, (ii) powered prosthetic legs [30][31][32][33], (iii) exoskeletons [34], (iv) monopedal robots [35,36], and (v) quadruped robots [37]. In the HZD approach, a set of output functions, referred to as virtual constraints, is defined for the continuous-time dynamics of the system and asymptotically driven to zero by partial linearizing feedback controllers [38].…”
Section: Related Work For Legged Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HZD-based controllers have been validated numerically and experimentally for (i) 2D and 3D bipedal robots, including RABBIT [17,18], MA-BEL [19][20][21], ERNIE [22], AMBER [23], ATRIAS [24][25][26][27], and DURUS [28,29] prototypes, (ii) powered prosthetic legs [30][31][32][33], (iii) exoskeletons [34], (iv) monopedal robots [35,36], and (v) quadruped robots [37]. In the HZD approach, a set of output functions, referred to as virtual constraints, is defined for the continuous-time dynamics of the system and asymptotically driven to zero by partial linearizing feedback controllers [38].…”
Section: Related Work For Legged Locomotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where 20is a BMI condition, and from the LMI (21) and the Schur complement lemma, η is an upper bound on the 2-norm of ∆ξ, i.e., η > ∆ξ 2 2 . The cost function (19) then minimizes a weighted sum of −γ and µ with the weighting factor w > 0 as a tradeoff between improving the convergence rate and minimizing η to have a good approximation based on the Taylor series expansion.…”
Section: B Iterative Bmi Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, transverse linearization and HZD-based controllers are the only controllers of these methods that explicitly deal with general cases of underactuation. HZD-based controllers have been validated numerically and experimentally for 2D and 3D bipedal robots [10]- [19], 2D and 3D powered prosthetic legs [20]- [25], exoskeletons [26], monopedal [27] and quadruped robots [28]. In this approach, a set of output functions, referred to as virtual constraints, is defined for the continuous-time dynamics of the system and asymptotically driven to zero by the input-output (I-O) linearizing feedback controller [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x (t) 2 S; (4) where S is the set of all feasible states belonging to the walking surface de ned as follows:…”
Section: Overall Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots and, especially, biped robots have been a research magnate in the last decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], giving rise to fascinating robots and products. To achieve such great products, a wide range of topics from studying biological locomotion and their mechanical model, model formulation, methods of gait synthesis, and the mechanical realization of biped robots to the control of such systems have been addressed in the literature, e.g., see [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%