2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of space heating systems in an industrial building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Newnan et al [69], 2% is the lowest acceptable IRR for investments in energy efficiency, but companies are more focused on the short term, and hence a higher IRRs are usually requested to opt for a certain investment [70]. Table 6, the feasibility of the different cases, with or without subsidies, is reported: in the case of negative NPV and IRR the system is not economically feasible; if the IRR is lower than the acceptable rate of return (2%), the investment should be carefully evaluated; finally, if the IRR is acceptable and the NPV positive the system installation is feasible.…”
Section: Economic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Newnan et al [69], 2% is the lowest acceptable IRR for investments in energy efficiency, but companies are more focused on the short term, and hence a higher IRRs are usually requested to opt for a certain investment [70]. Table 6, the feasibility of the different cases, with or without subsidies, is reported: in the case of negative NPV and IRR the system is not economically feasible; if the IRR is lower than the acceptable rate of return (2%), the investment should be carefully evaluated; finally, if the IRR is acceptable and the NPV positive the system installation is feasible.…”
Section: Economic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importance of productivity of buildings' occupants on LCC of the buildings could be reflected on the ratio of cost associated with HVAC&R systems. Based on the cost database related to a range of 20 different HVAC&R Not explicitly defined Wang, Jing, and Zhang (2009b) Not explicitly defined Wang, Jing, and Zhang (2009a) Not explicitly defined Chiness, Nardin, and Saro (2011) Not explicitly defined Arroyo et al (2016) San Francisco, US Notes: Category 1 Studies which are highly detailed and examine both HVAC&R system performance evaluation and decision-making analysis. Category 2 represents the research studies that aimed to cover a broad range of alternatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Category 4 covers the Studies which are mainly focused on their adopted decision-making methods. Camejo and Hittle (1989) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and basic rules of thumb Quantitative: cost estimation Fazio, Zmeureanu, and Kowalski (1989) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and publications Quantitative: psychrometric analysis Hitchcock (1991) Quantitative: numerical simulation and cost estimation Shams, Nelson, and Maxwell (1994a) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and publications Quantitative: cost estimation Korolija et al (2009) Quantitative: numerical simulation Shapiro and Umit (2011) Quantitative: numerical simulation 4 Thiel and Mroz (2001) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and publications Quantitative: cost estimation and numerical simulation Wang et al (2008) It is based on secondary data developed by Yu (2002) Wang, Jing, andZhang (2009b) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and publications Quantitative: cost estimation Wang, Jing, and Zhang (2009a) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts Quantitative: cost estimation Chiness, Nardin, and Saro (2011) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts Quantitative: estimation of energy consumption using degree-days method plus cost estimation Arroyo et al (2016) Qualitative: knowledge acquisition from experts and publications Quantitative: cost estimation Notes: Category 1 Studies which are highly detailed and examine both HVAC&R system performance evaluation and decision-making analysis. Category 2 represents the research studies that aimed to cover a broad range of alternatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used in sustainability assessment for different electricity generation systems (Cartelle et al, 2015) or waste management models (Milutinović et al, 2014). It has further been used in the selection of space heating systems, the ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE) III method being used for a historic building (Thiel and Mroz, 2001) or AHP for an industrial building (Chinese and al., 2011). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Network is applied to categorize buildings according to their overall energy performance (Kabak et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the number of contributions which choose the most suitable maintenance policy in electrical power distributions systems is practically non-existent, and even more so in the case of buildings, where the gaps in the literature are even greater, as mentioned by Chinese et al (2011). Although in the last decade the number of contributions analysing the choice of maintenance policies via MCDM has increased somewhat, historically this strategic decision has been very little researched (Wang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%