2014 7th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops 2014
DOI: 10.1109/u-media.2014.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria Comparative Evaluation of the E-Learning Systems: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another concept widely discussed in the literature, considered an essential criterion for evaluating an e-learning system, is the ability to personalise (Alptekin and Karsak, 2011; Munkhtsetseg et al. , 2014; Shee and Wang, 2008) the system.…”
Section: Case Study and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another concept widely discussed in the literature, considered an essential criterion for evaluating an e-learning system, is the ability to personalise (Alptekin and Karsak, 2011; Munkhtsetseg et al. , 2014; Shee and Wang, 2008) the system.…”
Section: Case Study and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another concept widely discussed in the literature, considered an essential criterion for evaluating an e-learning system, is the ability to personalise (Alptekin and Karsak, 2011;Munkhtsetseg et al, 2014;Shee and Wang, 2008) the system. The personalisation is mainly related to the computational environment (as design interface), content (as recommending specific modules and courses) and instructions received by students.…”
Section: Evolution Of Scientific Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most important subfactors in content quality are useful content (local weight = 0.396) and up-to-date content (local weight = 0.221), which means that the course materials uploaded in e-learning should be useful, up-to-date, and fit the current needs of learners (Garg & Jain, 2017;Munkhtsetseg et al, 2014;Sadi-Nezhad et al, 2010). Good content quality enhances learner-content interaction while poor content quality raises the dropout rates of e-learning courses (Bhuasiri et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have flexible learning solutions, having the possibility of choosing the didactic process, without space and time limits, but, above all, they create new knowledge and contents to share on-line. In this context, the learning object is continuously fragmented and rebuilt thanks to the collective and collaborative elaboration with new participative technologies [22] in a highly social and interactive environment.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the E-learning Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%