2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-criteria decision analysis for sub-watersheds ranking via the PROMETHEE method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Version I is just a partial ranking, reason enough not to use it in our methodology, while version II is a full ranking. PROMETHEE-II is an extensively documented method, and the reader can find information about this method in [40,41].…”
Section: Intensity Of Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Version I is just a partial ranking, reason enough not to use it in our methodology, while version II is a full ranking. PROMETHEE-II is an extensively documented method, and the reader can find information about this method in [40,41].…”
Section: Intensity Of Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method attracts much attention. It is widely used in different fields, such as energy sources [28,29], sub-watersheds ranking [30], military airport location selection [25]. PROMETHEE has been extended to different versions, such as PROMETHEE II, PROMETHEE III, and PROMETHEE IV [31].…”
Section: Pltssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Vulevic and Dragovic (2017) [16], used the PROMETHEE II method ranking of nine sub-watersheds delineated in the Topciderska river watershed, Serbia;…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%