2020
DOI: 10.31223/x5f01t
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-decadal improvement in U.S. lake water clarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the relationship between the Landsat surface reflectance product and the measured TSM performed well (R 2 = 0.82). Calculating the validation error metrics using the random validation data set data (n = 38) can reaffirm the sensor correction procedure [31]. The validation metrics for the TSM retrieval model showed the RMSE of 8.23 mg/L, MAPE of 30% and bias of −2.35 mg/L.…”
Section: A Assessment Of the Landsat-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the relationship between the Landsat surface reflectance product and the measured TSM performed well (R 2 = 0.82). Calculating the validation error metrics using the random validation data set data (n = 38) can reaffirm the sensor correction procedure [31]. The validation metrics for the TSM retrieval model showed the RMSE of 8.23 mg/L, MAPE of 30% and bias of −2.35 mg/L.…”
Section: A Assessment Of the Landsat-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…While the atmospheric corrections used to generate these surface reflectance products were originally developed for terrestrial applications, a growing body of research shows that they can be used to accurately estimate inland water quality parameters [29], [30] and perform on par with water-specific atmospheric correction algorithms [31]. The Landsat surface reflectance product (from LEDAPS and LaSRC) have been used to estimate chlorophyll, clarity and CDOM in lakes, reservoirs and rivers at different reginal scales [29], [32]- [34].…”
Section: A Assessment Of the Landsat-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%