2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2013.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-dimensional criteria for testing web services transactions

Abstract: Web services (WS) transactions are important in order to reliably compose distributed and autonomous services into composite web services and to ensure that their execution is consistent and correct. But such transactions are generally complex and they require longer processing time, and manipulate critical data. Thus various techniques have been developed in order to perform quality assessment of WS transactions in terms of response time efficiency, failure recovery and throughput. This paper focuses on the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several test cases are designed based on information about the proposed framework or the Software Under Test (SUT). We adopt the software testing strategy which is based multi-dimensional criteria [58]. The generation of test cases is based on the execution protocols presented in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several test cases are designed based on information about the proposed framework or the Software Under Test (SUT). We adopt the software testing strategy which is based multi-dimensional criteria [58]. The generation of test cases is based on the execution protocols presented in Fig.…”
Section: Evaluation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mei et al studied both traditional test adequacy criteria [25] and new dataflow-based test adequacy criteria [24] to test WS-BPEL web services. Casado et al [9] used a classification-tree methodology [12], [15] to determine the test coverage of web services transactions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Casado et al [11] used a classification-tree methodology [15], [21] to determine test coverage in the testing of web services transactions. Our coverage model has not considered constraints among coverage elements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%