2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-document extractive text summarization: A comparative assessment on features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26], [37]. The English language MA is based on the use of finite state machines and finite state transducer [23], [24], [31].…”
Section: B Dictionary-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[26], [37]. The English language MA is based on the use of finite state machines and finite state transducer [23], [24], [31].…”
Section: B Dictionary-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The words found in every hundred documents and occurs less often have IDF>2. Almost all topics characterization likelihood, by certain words, has IDF close to 2 [24], [25], [44]. TF-IDF gives maximum value if rare words have many occurrences in the document [26], [29].…”
Section: Text Relevance By Term Frequency-inverse Document Frequenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors could add features that were relevant to the subject to the document defined by feature set to enhance the classification of the text. The authors [15] explored various forms of terms frequency and topic-related data, and these were considered traits for supporting vector machine. The experimental results on three companies showed that the accuracy of text classification could be improved by combined features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%