Multi-level mentoring practices in a Teacher Education Program in Greece

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reflect the multi-level mentoring practices of a Teacher Education Program in Greece and the mentors’ perceptions on them. The mentoring practices of the specific Program are unique in Teacher Education in Greece; and therefore, the paper examines the extent to which they are considered as capable of developing in mentors and mentees specific skills that contribute to the development of student-teachers’ professional identity. Design/methodology/approach The case study is based on qualitative research and 32 interviews with mentors of the specific Program who report their experience. Six mentees have also been asked to provide the researchers with comments, so as to observe whether their answers confirm the mentors’ perceptions. Findings The different types of mentoring of the specific Program are perceived as able to enhance the mentors’ and the mentees’ professional development and self-confidence as well as to the latters’ improved transition and engagement to the Program. The authors also contribute to the fostering of the mentees’ experiential learning and to the capitalization of knowledge in Teacher Education. The EES teacher mentoring is considered of important adding value to the formation of student-teachers’ professional identity, according to the mentors interviewed. Mentees comments were found to confirm the mentors’ perceptions. Originality/value The conclusions of the paper are of significant value, since multi-level mentoring as a holistic approach to teacher-candidates’ experiential learning and professional development examined in a single paper is rather rare. Moreover, the Program of the paper’s case study follows this multi-level innovative approach, which includes EES teacher mentoring, and which is of considerable adding value, according to the mentors and the mentees interviewed. It could, therefore, constitute a paradigm for other Teacher Education Programs in Greece and in other countries.

How to Instill Cultural Values in the New Generation through Cultural Promenades and Ancient Drama: A Field Research

“…This statement also reminds of Brinia and Psoni's research, according to which learners acquire a new set of skills through re-enactment and role-playing by better comprehending complex cognitive concepts [21]. At the same time, participants confirmed that through such experiential activities, learning is made fun and internal incentives are developed in students, who get encouraged to participate, be part of a team, and develop interpersonal skills [22,[27][28][29].…”

“…Each student adopts different styles of cultural learning, and as a consequence, they should be respected, encouraged, and even incorporated into teaching by culturally receptive educators [26]. Teachers, and generally educators acting as mentors, help the students by answering their questions, coordinating this cultural experience, and cultivating incentives, while making learning fun, encouraging students to participate and be part of the team, and developing their interpersonal skills and monitoring the formation of dynamic relationships [27][28][29]. Therefore, the necessity of reform, methods, and programs implementation regarding experiential learning should be established [30,31].…”

Using multilevel mentoring as a situated learning approach to enhance the professional development of teachers in higher education

“…Consistent with the normative approach, mentoring could be defined as a relationship between an experienced academic (mentor) and a less experienced academic (mentee) that is motivated by trust and benevolence with the aim of supporting the professional development and retention of the mentee (Zentgraf, 2020). The evolving models of mentoring include multidisciplinary peer mentoring (Aarnikoivu et al, 2020); flexible and reflective mentoring (K apl ar-Kod acsy and Dorner, 2022); group mentoring (Mullen et al, 2020); structured peer mentoring (Simmonds and Dicks, 2018); electronic mentoring and cultural mentoring (Mullen and Klimaitis, 2021); and multilevel mentoring (Brinia and Psoni, 2018).…”

“…At the same time, there is a growing body of literature that have proposed that educational institutions should explore and develop effective approaches to mentoring (Aarnikoivu et al, 2020;K apl ar-Kod acsy and Dorner, 2022;Mullen et al, 2020). One of such growing mentoring systems is multilevel mentoring (Brinia and Psoni, 2018;Mullen and Klimaitis, 2021) that include diverse professional development activities that are designed to support institutional missions and policies concerning the retention and promotion of academics.…”

Positively supporting women faculty in the academy through a novel mentoring community model

“…Mentoring has been shown to have numerous positive benefits in the realm of academia and beyond, including the two primary functions of career advancement and psychosocial support. Mentoring contributes to increasing self-confidence and self-esteem; personal satisfaction; competence; and for both mentors and mentees, further exposure that can lead to professional networking, development, and respect from colleagues (Brinia and Psoni 2018;Chesler and Chesler, 2002;Darwin and Palmer, 2009;Lumpkin, 2011;Meschitti and Lawton Smith, 2017;Wasburn, 2007). As faculty networking is critical to timely career progression and development, mentoring has also been identified as a strategy to help address gender inequalities in higher education (Chandler, 1996;Wasburn, 2007; see also Dobele et al, 2014 on gender inequalities in higher education).…”