1995 IEEE Symposium on Low Power Electronics. Digest of Technical Papers
DOI: 10.1109/lpe.1995.482412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level pass-transistor logic for low-power ULSIs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach still suffers from the BDD size problem. A multi-level pass transistor logic is introduced in [17], which tries to maximize the logic shared between different parts of the circuit by looking at the structure of a monolithic BDD. Using a monolithic BDD as the starting point and modifying its structure has two disadvantages: first, the approach will not be viable for large circuits with exponentially sized BDDs.…”
Section: Ptl Network and Bddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this approach still suffers from the BDD size problem. A multi-level pass transistor logic is introduced in [17], which tries to maximize the logic shared between different parts of the circuit by looking at the structure of a monolithic BDD. Using a monolithic BDD as the starting point and modifying its structure has two disadvantages: first, the approach will not be viable for large circuits with exponentially sized BDDs.…”
Section: Ptl Network and Bddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each individual BDD can then be optimized by the techniques presented in this work and then mapped to a transistor-level circuit with appropriate buffering using [22]. Similarly, optimization algorithms for area, delay and power presented here can be applied to BDDs generated using [17] as well. In Section 5.2, we provide some more arguments on why, from a delay perspective for large circuits, a decomposed BDD approach is better than a monolithic BDD-based approach combined with buffer insertion.…”
Section: Ptl Network and Decomposed Bddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been a popular circuit choice for fast arithmetic operations such as arithmetic logic unit (ALU), multiplier, and processor data-flow elements such as multiplexer, barrier shifter, etc. [38], [42]- [44]. Implementation of this low-power circuit style in the low-power SOI technology would potentially result in substantial power reduction for low-power applications.…”
Section: Pass-transistor-based Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing rules are therefore improved for the NAND-like (nMOS stack) and NOR-like (pFET stack) configurations. Similarly, timing rules for pass-transistor-based circuits such as CPL [42]- [44] are improved due to the lack of reverse body effect in floating-body configuration in SOI. The timing rules for some other circuit topologies, however, are degraded by the parasitic bipolar effect and the transient threshold voltage variation discussed earlier.…”
Section: Global Design Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they cannot achieve high integration density and low power consumption. Therefore, it is necessary to develop promising synaptic devices incorporating emerging materials with advanced device architectures [20,21]. InGaZnO (IGZO)-based artificial synaptic transistors have been intensively studied as the IGZO semiconductor has high field-effect mobility, lowtemperature processability, and large scalability [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%