2022
DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2021.2025417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-locality in rural areas – an underestimated phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The political and social discussion on temporary presence and absence involves pressing questions related to mobility, reasonable land consumption, affordable housing, new typologies for changing residential demands, social infrastructure, community life, sustainable tourism, living and working in rural regions, etc. (Greinke and Lange 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The political and social discussion on temporary presence and absence involves pressing questions related to mobility, reasonable land consumption, affordable housing, new typologies for changing residential demands, social infrastructure, community life, sustainable tourism, living and working in rural regions, etc. (Greinke and Lange 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-local lifestyles do not cause broader societal and planning policy challenges related to spatial development in rural areas, compared to demographic changes, land consumption and urban sprawl, prevailing car-dependency and high traffic volumes, public livelihood support, social inequality, supply security and climate change. However, multi-locality can reinforce these challenges, which underscores its relevance for the spatial and regional planning sciences, as well as for municipal officials, policymakers and civil society (Greinke and Lange 2022). The challenges for regional planning have only recently been analysed in a few studies particularly addressing rural areas Di Marino and Lapintie 2020;Greinke and Hilti 2019;Neuböck et al 2019).…”
Section: The Perspective Of Regional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilocality, however, can be motivated (or forced) by work, family, care or ownership related to reasons leading to a myriad of different types of spatial and temporal mobilities that can have very different types of consequences on the rural and urban areas and on urban-rural relations (Gorman-Murray & Bissell, 2018;Pitkänen & Strandell, 2018). Particularly in rural areas, the alternating temporal presence and absence of multi-locals can be pronounced, leading to accumulated changes in local communities and the social, economic and environmental sustainability (Greinke & Lange, 2022;Rannanpää et al, 2022). This article focuses mostly on multi-locality related to rural second homes owned and used by people permanently living outside the rural localities.…”
Section: Multi-locality In Rural Sustainability Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments on digital multilocality (Di Marino & Lapintie, 2018;Greinke & Lange, 2022) highlighted the importance of cyclicality of work between the central office workplace and private peripheral workplace since alternating between both increases work efficiency (Bürgin et al, 2021). Nevertheless, although the work-from-home arrangement reduces stress and increases general productivity, it is also true that the excessive exposure of work activities to everyday life may threaten the overall well-being since the isolation from supportive co-workers may counteract the positive effects of working from home (George et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%