2013
DOI: 10.1364/boe.4.001890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-MHz retinal OCT

Abstract: Abstract:We analyze the benefits and problems of in vivo optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the human retina at A-scan rates in excess of 1 MHz, using a 1050 nm Fourier-domain mode-locked (FDML) laser. Different scanning strategies enabled by MHz OCT line rates are investigated, and a simple multi-volume data processing approach is presented. In-vivo OCT of the human ocular fundus is performed at different axial scan rates of up to 6.7 MHz. High quality non-mydriatic retinal imaging over an ultra-wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Axial resolution improvement (prerequisite 1) has been the key technological milestone in the history of OCT in its first decade, [10][11][12][13][14] which has been achieved by using ultra-broadband sources. OCT imaging speed improvements (prerequisite 2) evolved in its second decade, which were accomplished by Fourier domain (FD)/spectral domain (SD) [15][16][17][18] and swept source (SS) OCT. [19][20][21][22][23] While in FD/SD OCT speed is mainly determined by the readout time of the camera in a spectrometer, the wavelength-tuning speed of swept sources is the decisive factor in SS OCT. In the past 5 to 10 years, different swept source technologies have emerged to significantly improve imaging speed in (commercial) OCT systemsespecially the ones using wavelengths >1 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axial resolution improvement (prerequisite 1) has been the key technological milestone in the history of OCT in its first decade, [10][11][12][13][14] which has been achieved by using ultra-broadband sources. OCT imaging speed improvements (prerequisite 2) evolved in its second decade, which were accomplished by Fourier domain (FD)/spectral domain (SD) [15][16][17][18] and swept source (SS) OCT. [19][20][21][22][23] While in FD/SD OCT speed is mainly determined by the readout time of the camera in a spectrometer, the wavelength-tuning speed of swept sources is the decisive factor in SS OCT. In the past 5 to 10 years, different swept source technologies have emerged to significantly improve imaging speed in (commercial) OCT systemsespecially the ones using wavelengths >1 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past, it has sometimes been debated if it makes any sense to achieve ever higher OCT speeds. In general, the answer is complex, depends on the particular application, and needs to take into account changing limits for maximum permissible exposure, see e.g [9]. Moreover, the availability of suitable and cost-effective hardware is certainly crucial for successful commercialization.…”
Section: Fast Ultrafast Megahertzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B) for swept lasers with filters operating in resonance, producing a sinusoidal wavelength-over-time evolution, which yields reduced imaging range compared to a linear sweep, see Eq. (9). With buffering, only the most linear part of the sweep near the sweep center can be used, optimizing the OCT imaging range.…”
Section: Bufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) is able to achieve very high scan speeds and is less susceptible to interferogram fringe washout than spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) [1,2]. Therefore, it has advantages for both structural and Doppler OCT imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%