AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-3577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-mission Multi-objective Optimization in Commercial Aircraft Conceptual Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C Battery,FC = f Battery,FH (t mission )⋅t mission (18) Where f Battery,FH is the battery maintenance cost per flight hour which is considered as US$ 205 with the assumption of the battery capital cost as 100 $/kWh [25].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C Battery,FC = f Battery,FH (t mission )⋅t mission (18) Where f Battery,FH is the battery maintenance cost per flight hour which is considered as US$ 205 with the assumption of the battery capital cost as 100 $/kWh [25].…”
Section: Economic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the specified design missions, a multi-mission multi-objective optimization method for commercial aircraft conceptual design was proposed using NSGA II in Ref. [18]. This optimization method compared the difference between exclusively considering metrics of interest from one design mission and that of multiple missions, and further investigated the impact of weightings on optimization results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ECS sized by SDP and MDP sizing method obtain the design variables from the optimization process described in Sec. V. The aircraft selected to perform such analyses is a Large Twin-aisle Aircraft (LTA), whose specification can be found in the authors' previous work [29], with some design information relevant to this work summarized in Table 6.…”
Section: Mdp Sizing Methodology Validation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the vehicle point performance is invariant and its design mission requirements are met, the vehicle is resized for the design mission, maintaining the original design thrust-to-weight ratio and wing loading with the updated ECS pack mass and ram drag. The vehicle sizing and off-design mission performance evaluation is conducted using the Aircraft Sizing and Off-Design Mission Analysis Tool [29], which uses empirical component weight and drag build-up method from NASA's Flight Optimization System (FLOPS) software [30] to compute the basic vehicle empty weight and drag polar. SODA provides an interface to specify the mass of ECS packs and drag increment due to ram air intake as a function of altitude and Mach number.…”
Section: Mission-level Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on type of analysis, mission range may be input to solve for ramp weight, or vice versa. The Aircraft Sizing and Off-Design Mission Analysis Tool [29] is selected for mission analysis. In this framework, the mission analysis is performed twice:…”
Section: Fig 8 Generic Mission Profile For Commercial Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%