2022 6th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iccmc53470.2022.9753981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Modal Sarcasm Detection in Social Networks: A Comparative Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around thousand such references can be drawn on either of the two problems-aspect based categorisation of online data and language specific algorithm to apply with sentiment analysis using aspectbased methods. In [8], Dutta et al presented a review of different methods of sarcasm detection done so far. From which we can get a clear knowledge of methods invented so far for detecting good or bad words.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around thousand such references can be drawn on either of the two problems-aspect based categorisation of online data and language specific algorithm to apply with sentiment analysis using aspectbased methods. In [8], Dutta et al presented a review of different methods of sarcasm detection done so far. From which we can get a clear knowledge of methods invented so far for detecting good or bad words.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, identifying sarcasm is challenging because none of these indicators is readily present in written communication. Identifying sarcastic comments for images, videos, or text shared over social platforms is even more difficult as context lies with the image or the main text/comment/headline [3,4]. Sarcasm identification in online communications from social media sites, discussion forums, and e-commerce websites has become essential for fake news detection, sentiment analysis, opinion mining, and detecting of online trolls and cyberbullies [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%