2010
DOI: 10.1115/1.3213558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Axial Turbine Blades Using a Novel Multilevel Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: In this paper, a new multiploid genetic optimization method handling surrogate models of the CFD solutions is presented and applied for a multi-objective turbine blade aerodynamic optimization problem. A fast, efficient, robust, and automated design method is developed to aerodynamically optimize 3D gas turbine blades. The design objectives are selected as maximizing the adiabatic efficiency and torque so as to reduce the weight, size, and cost of the gas turbine engine. A 3D steady Reynolds averaged Navier–St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, total-to-total efficiency increased by 1.68 percent, and 1.28 percent improvement is achieved for total-to-static efficiency. Öksüz and Akmandor [17] utilized a Genetic Algorithm (GA) coupled with a surrogate model in their optimization process and defined two objective functions: adiabatic efficiency and torque. In another work presented by Li et al [18] a long blade of steam turbine stage was optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, total-to-total efficiency increased by 1.68 percent, and 1.28 percent improvement is achieved for total-to-static efficiency. Öksüz and Akmandor [17] utilized a Genetic Algorithm (GA) coupled with a surrogate model in their optimization process and defined two objective functions: adiabatic efficiency and torque. In another work presented by Li et al [18] a long blade of steam turbine stage was optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design optimisation processes are largely portable across similar applications, thus research can be conducted on optimisation techniques in axial turbines for different applications. Multiple sources are present, however, it is clear that the design optimisation topic is highly sensitive to manufacturers, with the majority of the sources being obsolete [5,6], as highlighted by the most recent paper on the topic [7]. The most notable common trait in previous examples of design optimisation is the fact that most of them were carried out using genetic algorithms (GAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öksüz and Akmandor published their MDO using a GA approach on an axial turbine in 2010 [7]. The authors optimised an axial turbine and stator profiles to maximise efficiency and torque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extracting high-pressure cooling air from the compressors also deteriorates the gas-turbine cycle efficiency, and decreasing the coolant fraction while keeping the hot component under a critical temperature is important. In the traditional three-dimensional (3D) blade redesign procedure, the turbines are always optimized for a given mass flow rate and expansion ratio to achieve higher aerodynamic efficiency, without considering the possible coolant-requirement change caused by the aerodynamic redesign [2]. Therefore, the traditional redesign method can lead to a turbine design with higher component efficiency but may not maximize the gas-turbine cycle efficiency, which is also highly influenced by the coolant fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%