2014 Second International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cbd.2014.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Ant Colony System for Data-Intensive Service Provision

Abstract: Data-intensive services have become one of the most challenging applications in cloud computing. The classical service composition problem will face new challenges as the services and correspondent data grow. A typical environment is the large scale scientific project AMS, which we are processing huge amount of data streams. In this paper, we will resolve service composition problem by considering the multi-objective dataintensive features. We propose to apply ant colony optimization algorithms and implemented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In multi-objective ant colony system (MOACS) problem, every solution by ant is measured according to more than one objective function, each of which must be minimized or maximized [28] [29]. In group formation problem using MOACS, the objective function is the objective of attribute that must be heterogeneous (maximized) or homogeneous (minimized).…”
Section: ) Initialization Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In multi-objective ant colony system (MOACS) problem, every solution by ant is measured according to more than one objective function, each of which must be minimized or maximized [28] [29]. In group formation problem using MOACS, the objective function is the objective of attribute that must be heterogeneous (maximized) or homogeneous (minimized).…”
Section: ) Initialization Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the regions where the points of the two surfaces were found to differ from each other, there are three situations: 1) if the points of the median attainment surfaces of MOACS dominate those of MOGA, then the label MOACS is put near the points, 2) if the points of the median attainment surfaces of MOGA dominate those of MOACS, then the label MOGA is put near the points, 3) if the points of the median attainment surfaces of MOACS are not dominated by those of MOGA and the points of the median attainment surfaces of MOGA are not dominated by those of MOACS, then no label is put. The details of all the median summary attainment surface of MOACS and MOGA were given in [42] The lessons learned from the experimental results are that, when we have a large number of concrete services available for each abstract service, a multi-objective genetic algorithm can achieve better solutions. On the other hand, whenever the number of concrete services available is small, such as in some simple and repetitive scientific computation, a multi-objective ant colony system is to be preferred to a multi-objective genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first four metrics measure the convergence of the Pareto-optimal solutions, while the fifth metric measures the distribution of the Pareto-optimal set obtained by a multi-objective optimization algorithm. The details of these metrics were given in [42]. A comprehensive comparison of the two algorithms were provided in the following.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations